Big Oil’s Long Term Energy Plan? A One World Government and Global Depopulation

The Intel Hub
By Alexander Higgins

For those looking for proof of the global elite pushing plans for global depopulation and a one world governments need to look no further than the massive amount of propaganda being spread by Big Oil under the label of “Peak Oil”.

On the surface the propagandists argue that demand for oil will soon surpass the world’s ability to produce oil.

Beneath the surface is a network of the super elite including Government spooks, lawyers, doctors and other wealthy and highly influential people whose publications openly call for martial law, a one world government and global depopulation to deal with the “inevitable collapse of the entire industrialized world.”

The elitists behind the peak oil movement have penetrated all levels of governments around the world, including the highest levels of policy making in military, intelligence, executive and legislative branches.

This is not conspiratorial, they openly lobby governments world wide, including here in the United States, “to do what it is not inclined to do” in the United States, including preparing martial law and massive global depopulation.

As Life After The Oil Crash puts it:

Civilization as we know it is coming to an end soon. This is not the wacky proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse bible prophecy sect, or conspiracy theory society. Rather, it is the scientific conclusion of the best paid, most widely-respected geologists, physicists, bankers, and investors in the world. These are rational, professional, conservative individuals who are absolutely terrified by a phenomenon known as global “Peak Oil.”

…

These estimate comes from numerous sources, not the least of which is Vice President Dick Cheney himself. In a 1999 speech he gave while still CEO of Halliburton, Cheney stated:

By some estimates, there will be an average of two-percent annual growth in global oil demand over the years ahead, along with, conservatively, a three-percent natural decline in production from existing reserves. That means by 2010 we’ll need an additional 50 million barrels per day. Source

Cheney’s assesement is supported by the estimates of numerous non-political, retired, and now disinterested scientists, many of whom believe global oil production will peak and go into terminal decline within the next five years, if it hasn’t already. Source

…

Estimates coming out of the oil industry indicate that this drop in production has already begun. Source

The consequences of this are almost unimaginable. As we slide down the downslope slope of the global oil production curve, we may find ourselves slipping into something best described as a “post industrial stone age.” Source

…

“Was the Bush administration aware of this when planning the invasion and occupation of Iraq?”

Of course they were.

Significant elements of US national security apparatus have been aware of Peak Oil since at least 1977 when the CIA prepared a now-declassified report on it. Professor Richard Heinberg explains:

The 1977 CIA document shows clear and detailed awareness of oil issues, including depletion, extraction technologies, pipelines, areas of likely new discovery, the quality of existing reserves, and the dynamics of the global oil market. The CIA has obviously been studying oil very carefully for some time and must therefore understand the issue of global oil peak. Source

. . . energy consumption is indispensable to our standard of living and a necessity for the Army to carry out its mission. However, current trends are not sustainable. The impact of excessive, unsustainable energy consumption may undermine the very culture and activities it supports . . . Source

While all of that doom an gloom is quite scary if you read the propaganda for the solutions they are pushing you will be shocked that the policies don’t include a future for the average common folk like you and me.

Life After The Oil Crash goes on to explain how governments are preparing for the upcoming “oil collapse”.

“Are Western governments preparing for this?”

In January 2006, the Department of Homeland Security gave Halliiburton subsidiary Kellog, Brown, & Root a $400 million dollar contract to build vast new domestic detention camps within the United States…

… The expectation of this unraveling may be at least partially responsible for the Bush administration’s drive to pass draconian police-state style legislation.

… the Pentagon has been running “war games on the grandest scale” to simulate how billions of people will react to food and fuel shortages, including shortages on the U.S. homeland:

. . . the U.S. Department of Defense may already be creating a copy of you in an alternate reality to see how long you can go without food or water, or how you will respond to televised propaganda.

Called the Sentient World Simulation (SWS), the program replicates financial institutions, utilities, media outlets, and street corner shops. By applying theories of economics and human psychology, its developers believe they can predict how individuals and mobs will respond to various stressors.

Yank a country’s water supply. Stage a military coup. SWS will tell you what happens next. Homeland Security is already using SWS to simulate crises on the US mainland. Source

.. the Department of Homeland Security has used artificial-intelligence powered “social networking analysis” tools similar to SWS to compile a list of 8 million Americans who may be detained during a national emergency:

According to a senior government official . . . “There exists a database of Americans, who, often for the slightest and most trivial reason, are considered unfriendly, and who, in a time of panic, might be incarcerated. The database can identify and locate perceived ‘enemies of the state’ almost instantaneously.” . . . One knowledgeable source claims that 8 million Americans are now listed in Main Core as potentially suspect. In the event of a national emergency, these people could be subject to everything from heightened surveillance and tracking to direct questioning and possibly even detention. Source

The Pentagon has also developed an “energy islanding” strategy in which the armed services and/or private contractors will seize large-scale domestic renewable energy installations once the crisis hits. Journalist Michael Kane explains:

The DoD plans to act in consort with utilities to implement “islanding strategies” for their domestic installations to deal with emergencies and fuel shortages. Think of this as an “energy island” that the military is on and you are not. When big wind and solar farms come online they are placed on the Pentagon’s map, and when that energy is eventually need for one of their installations or industrial producers they will simply take it through a well-orchestrated alliance with gigantic energy firms. Source

And from the third page:

How are people likely to react to this?

As the US economy disintegrates, one is hard pressed to imagine a scenario when violence bordering on chaos does not become widespread. The anticipation of massive unrest resulting from declining oil production may be the real reason why the Department of Homeland Security recently contracted with a subsidiary of Halliburton to build massive new domestic detention camps.

…

In 2004, commentator Robert Freeman explained how a decline in oil production will affect the global economy:

. . civilization will be stupendously different. The onset of rapid depletion will trigger convulsions on a global scale, including, likely, global pandemics and die-offs of significant portions of the world’s human population. The “have” countries will face the necessity kicking the “have-nots” out of the global lifeboat in order to assure their own survival. Source

In 2006, geologist Jeremy Leggett explained how newly-empowered fascists are likely to use varous tools of repression to wage this battle for survival:

By 2010 democracy will be on the run . . . economic hardship will bring out the worst in people. Fascists will rise, feeding on the anger of the newly poor and whipping up support. These new rulers will find the tools of repression — emergency laws, prison camps, a relaxed attitude toward torture — already in place, courtesy of the war on terror. Source

In 2007 John Robb, a former U.S. Special Forces mission commander, explained how this battle for survival is likely to play out in North America, neighborhood by neighborhood:

Wealthy individuals and multinational corporations will be the first to bail out of our collective system, opting instead to hire private military companies, such as Blackwater and Triple Canopy, to protect their homes and facilities and establish a protective perimeter around daily life.

Members of the middle class will follow, taking matters into their own hands by forming suburban collectives to share the costs of security–as they do now with education–and shore up delivery of critical services. These “armored suburbs” will deploy and maintain backup generators and communications links; they will be patrolled by civilian police auxiliaries . . .

As for those without the means to build their own defense, they will have to make do with the remains of the national system. They will gravitate to America’s cities, where they will be subject to ubiquitous surveillance and marginal or nonexistent services. For the poor, there will be no other refuge. Source

While these peak oiler’s offer up apocalyptic style “end of days” doomsday scenarios even more alarming is the draconian solutions they propose to fix the crisis that they are manufacturer.

Take this thread arguing for global depopulation and discussing ways to eliminate poor people.

Lifeboat ethics is a metaphor for resource distribution proposed by the ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1974. Hardin’s metaphor details a lifeboat bearing 50 people, which has room for ten more. The lifeboat is in an ocean surrounded by a hundred swimmers. The “ethics” of the situation stems from whether and under what circumstances swimmers should be taken aboard the lifeboat.

Here are the concluding paragraphs from Hardin’s Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor:

…

To be generous with one’s own possessions is quite different from being generous with those of posterity. We should call this point to the attention of those who from a commendable love of justice and equality would institute a system of the commons, either in the form of a world food bank, or of unrestricted immigration. We must convince them if we wish to save at least some parts of the world from environmental ruin.

Without a true world government to control reproduction and the use of available resources, the sharing ethic of the spaceship is impossible. For the foreseeable future, our survival demands that we govern our actions by the ethics of a lifeboat, harsh though they may be. Posterity will be satisfied with nothing less.

Somewhere between equality/justice for all and one dictator (benign or otherwise) lies an inflection point. Where society finds equilibrium on these ‘lifeboat levels’ is a question worthy of discussion. (And who will be discussing these questions is also a question worthy of discussion).

Comments (snippets)

• Is there anything to discuss? Does anyone with a scintilla of intelligence really still question the need for a lower population on this planet? Julian Simon is dead (an early death, thankfully), and his ideas are dead too. As David Attenborough said: “Instead of controlling the environment for the benefit of the population, maybe we should control the population to ensure the survival of our environment.” And won’t people start controlling their numbers automatically when life starts getting more and more difficult?…
• Darwin ‘got it’ 200 years ago. Only compulsory PLANETARY population limits can work.
• And may the people who breed like rabbits be damned.
• We should adopt a eugenics program and breed a highly intelligent, low energy consumption, naturally spiritual variety of human, call it homo noeticus…
• Is there a solution to this problem – yes, teaching ecological science in schools, accepting that humans have limits and the population may be far over that limit, western society has the biggest problem and our political culture needs to radically change. Will this happen though? To me it is likely humans will come into balance with our resources via the four horse men of the apocalypse. I genuinely wish there was another way, but the collective political culture see no limits. As the G7 have declared full steam ahead with our economic paradigm.
• The irony about reducing our numbers voluntarily is while the intelligent people reduce their offspring (they already have) the people who are least “fit” outproduce them. See Garrett Hardin’s Tragedy of The Commons” http://dieoff.org/page95.htm
  Although early agriculture was grueling and required far more work than a hunter gatherer existence it gave rise to “elites”. These elites brought civilization with all of its merits and pitfalls including war. Civilization became the dominant paradigm in large part due to high fertility.
• Family size limitation is futile unless mandatory and enforceable.

• Does anybody knows a practical way of limiting family size short of forced sterilization of parents?

  Hmm, let’s see, peak oil, climate change, global economic collapse, and breakdown of civilization’s safety nets. Then Momma Nature delivers a coup de grâce with a little mutation, and voilà, no need to worry about forced sterilization anymore. Ain’t nature wonderful?
  
  WHO warns of rising bird flu pandemic risk

  According to the group, the bird flu virus is now endemic in Asia, Africa and parts of Europe as the disease continues to spread in bird populations. There’s great concern that at some point the virus will mutate into a new version that is easily spread among humans. Even in its current strains bird flu has infected 382 people and killed 241 of them–an astonishingly high rate of death for a virus. Indonesia has been the hardest hit, counting 108 deaths from the virus.

Perhaps even more disturbing is this little piece titled Peak Oil, Carrying Capacity and Overshoot: Population, the Elephant in the Room – Revisited.

The article calls for global depopulation to 1 billion people so the “elite” can enjoy a comfortable standard of living.

The human cost of such an involuntary population rebalancing is, of course, horrific. Based on this model we would experience an average excess death rate of 100 million per year every year for the next 75 years to achieve our target population of one billion by 2082. The peak excess death rate would happen in about 20 years, and would be about 200 million that year. To put this in perspective, WWII caused an excess death rate of only 10 million per year for only six years.

Given this, it’s not hard to see why population control is the untouchable elephant in the room - the problem we’re in is simply too big for humane or even rational solutions. It’s also not hard to see why some people are beginning to grasp the inevitability of a human die-off.

One of the common accusations leveled at those who present analyses like this is that by doing so they are advocating or hoping for the massive population reductions they describe, and are encouraging draconian and inhumane measures to achieve them. Nothing could be further from the truth. I am personally quite attached to the world I’ve grown up in and the people that inhabit it, as is every other population commentator I am familiar with. However, in my ecological and Peak Oil research over the last several years I have begun to see the shape of a looming catastrophe that has absolutely nothing to do with human intentions, good or ill. It is the simple product of our species’ continuing growth in both numbers and ability, an exponential growth that is taking place within the finite ecological niche of the entire world. Our recent effusive growth has been fueled by the draw-down of primordial stocks of petroleum which are about to deplete while our numbers and activities continue to grow. This is a simple, obvious recipe for disaster.

The Georgia Guidestones

The disturbing part is after your done reading the above article is that you are almost convinced that there is no other solution besides killing off 7 billion people to reduce the world’s population to somewhere between 1 billion and 500 million.

That is until you realize all of this is propaganda from elitists who are trying to implement a one world government so they can hoard all of the earth’s resources for themselves.

But exposing the elitists at this point may do little good.

The architects who have engineered this clever trap are psychologically propagating a downward spiral of events whose destiny is almost a guaranteed through a self fulfilling prophecy.

Indeed all it would take is a single event to panic the masses into believing that doomsday has arrived for their agenda to be fulfilled.

But don’t be fooled there are alternatives and the longer we wait to kick oil for energy needs the closer we get to becoming slaves whose bloodlines will will eventually be depopulated off the earth through voluntary or involuntary sterilization.

No matter how much they tell us it we can’t kick oil for energy needs the truth of the matter is YES WE CAN!

The question is “How much longer will we allow ourselves to be helpless sheep being led to the slaughter?”

Every second we wait is one more second closer to the “crash” and once it happens we can all kiss our asses good bye.