ET Abductee: "DIsclosure" event planned using human-looking offspring of dimensional predatory ETs

Satan Worship is Goal of One-World Religion

henrymakow.com

Left, Illuminati Jewish program to discredit the Bible and Christianity include claims that a tomb containing the bones of Jesus and Mary Magdalene was found.






As James Perloff shows, the Illuminati set out to systematically destroy Christianity and belief in God. 

Do we need any more proof that we are ruled by a satanic cult?

by James Perloff
(henrymakow.com)

The Bible and the Protocols agree: one world government and religion are coming.

Revelation 13:7 says the Antichrist will have "authority over every tribe, people, language and nation." Protocol 5:11 says the Illuminati plan to "absorb all the state forces of the world and to form a super-government."

Revelation 13:8 says that "inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast." Protocol 15:20 brags "they will acknowledge the autocracy of our ruler with a devotion bordering on 'apotheosis'" [glorification as a god]. He "will be the real pope of the universe, the patriarch of the international church." (17:4)

For Satan to rule Earth autocratically, he must not only consolidate governments and currencies, but belief systems. But how could he unite something so diverse as religions?

THE PLAN

The long-term strategy: (1) splinter a religion into sects on the "divide and conquer" principle; (2) assault the religion's foundations, creating doubts among believers; (3) finally, herd the remnants together with other religions - i.e., ecumenism.

Let's see how this played out in Christianity. Protocol 17:5 says of churches: "we shall fight against them by criticism calculated to produce schism." Over centuries, Christianity has been splintered into increasingly smaller sects. For example, the Jehovah's Witnesses were founded by a Freemason, Charles Taze Russell. 

To plant doubts in believers, Darwin's theory of evolution was introduced as a "scientific" alternative to creation by God. Protocols 2:3 flaunts "the successes we arranged for Darwinism."

Attacks on the Bible achieved what Protocol 17:2 terms "the complete wrecking of that Christian religion." The Rockefellers funded seminaries that questioned the Gospel, most notoriously the Union Theological Seminary. In the late 19th century, Union Theological professor Charles Briggs introduced "Higher Criticism," in America claiming the Bible was error-ridden.  

In 1922, Harry Emerson Fosdick, left, gave a landmark sermon which cast doubt on the Bible being God's Word, the Virgin Birth, the Second Coming, and Christ's death as atonement for sins. He declared those holding these beliefs "intolerant."

His sermon sparked outrage, and Fosdick was forced to resign. However, he was immediately hired as pastor of Riverside Church - attended and built by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. for $4 million. Rockefeller paid for 130,000 copies of Fosdick's sermon to be printed and distributed to ministers. Fosdick's brother Raymond was president of the Rockefeller Foundation.

The views expressed by theologians like Briggs and Fosdick were called "Modernism," which included denying Christ's divinity, miracles and resurrection. Modernism was not a quibbling over some gray area of theology; it was total repudiation of Christianity's major tenets. With Rockefeller funding, it permeated seminaries and churches.

Recently Modernism has gone further; the Jesus Seminar (financial backers unpublicized) declared over 80 percent of sayings attributed to Jesus weren't authentic. The Da Vinci Code - this century's best-selling novel, thought by John Coleman to be a Tavistock creation - claimed Jesus wasn't resurrected and married Mary Magdalene. Shortly after the film version's release, a Discovery Channel documentary claimed a tomb had been found containing the bones of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.

ECUMENISM AND SOCIAL GOSPEL UNDERMINING FAITH

Consolidation of churches required organizations. The Rockefellers funded the National Council of Churches. John Foster Dulles was chosen to spearhead the ecumenism drive.  Dulles was a Rockefeller in-law, chairman of the Rockefeller Foundation trustees, a founding CFR member who helped draft the UN Charter (which never mentions God.)

In 1942, Dulles chaired a 30-denomination meeting which called for "a world government of delegated powers." Not content unifying America's churches, Dulles traveled to Amsterdam in 1948 to attend the founding conference of the World Council of Churches. Director of research for this foundation-funded conference was John Bennett - president of Union Theological and a CFR member.

Among today's ecumenical traps: the Tony Blair Faith Foundation. The former British prime minister - a consummate insider - said he wanted to "promote respect, friendship and understanding between the major religious faiths" since "globalization pushes us ever closer."

But even with structures for consolidation, the question remained: how to motivate churches to unite. Since denominations often disagree on theology, the strategy was to encourage collaboration where they did agree: values (e.g., helping the poor and sick.) This materialized in an action-based program, "the Social Gospel" (socialism masked as religion.)

Walter Rauschenbusch, trained at Rockefeller-funded Rochester Theological Seminary, became "Father of the Social Gospel," declaring that "the only power that can make socialism succeed, if it is established, is religion."

Perhaps the most notorious "Social Gospel" pusher: Rockefeller-backed Reverend Harry F. Ward, who long taught at Union Theological. Ward, the ACLU's first chairman, was called by labor leader Samuel Gompers "the most ardent pro-Bolshevik cleric in this country." Ward helped found the Methodist Federation for Social Action, which advised Christians to downplay the Gospel and fight for things like social justice, better labor conditions, and "world peace" - i.e., the goals Marxists proclaimed.

Missionary work was targeted. In 1930, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. funded the "Laymen's Foreign Missions Inquiry," which recommended missionaries downplay Christian doctrines and ally with other religions in doing good works. Although most denominations were critical of the report, former missionary Pearl Buck praised it in the media. Subsequently her novel The Good Earth received the Nobel Prize.

This "unity through action" strategy continues today. The Tony Blair Faith Foundation's original website had a "Social Action Projects" page which asked viewers to sign a declaration stating: "I commit to working together with people of all faiths to fight against disease and poverty." 

  
Rick Warren, author of The Purpose Driven Life (over 30 million sold) is America's current Social Gospel point man.  In 2008, backed by a $2 million Rupert Murdoch donation, Warren launched the PEACE Coalition. Time magazine headlined it: "RICK WARREN GOES GLOBAL." Warren said the coalition's goal was "to mobilize 1 billion Christians worldwide."

Warren, who is a CFR member, gave the invocation at Obama's inauguration, and was dubbed "America's pastor" by CNN.  He's anointed, but by who?



 CATHOLICS

The Illuminati haven't forgotten Catholicism. Protocol 17:3: "When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court...we shall penetrate to its very bowels."
Like other churches, Catholics have recently seen major ecumenical developments, such as: the signing of the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification by Lutheran and Catholic representatives (1999); dialogue with Eastern Orthodox churches, resulting in the Common Declaration of Pope Benedict XVI and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I (2006); an unprecedented Catholic-Muslim summit at the Vatican (2008); and visits of Pope Benedict XVI to Israel and to the Great Synagogue of Rome (2009).

And Catholicism has experienced its own "social action" movement - comparable to the tactics of Harry F. Ward and Rick Warren - as in the doctrine of liberation theology, which was prominent in Latin America beginning in the 1950s and 60s, where the Gospel took a back seat to fighting poverty and social injustice via Marxist precepts.

Protocols 17:2: "as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now."

ONE WORLD RELIGION

The final mechanism for one-world religion might be Project Blue Beam. According to Serge Monast, satellite-projected holograms in the sky (the "image of the beast" predicted by the Bible), will be tailored to religious populations in Earth's different regions.

To induce worship, the Antichrist will not initially appear as a tyrant, but as a "savior." To save us from what? Probably from all the chaos the satanic Illuminati will have created: wars ignited by false flags, famines from artificial food shortages, plagues from viruses synthesized in laboratories, HAARP-generated storms and earthquakes, and perhaps even a fake "Blue Beam" alien attack, simulated by holograms of spaceships. Having contrived these disasters, it will easy for him to stop them. By turning off HAARP, for example, he will appear to duplicate the feat of Jesus in quelling the storm on the Sea of Galilee. These high-tech counterfeit "miracles" will allow him to be accepted as God, as Christ returned.

But any "saving" will be short-lived. Once enthroned in Jerusalem (the end goal of Zionism), Satan will use his absolute dictatorship to unleash his greatest cruelties on the world. Worshiping the Antichrist will undoubtedly include human sacrifices - a practice consistently associated with Satan worship, from child sacrifices offered to the demonic Baal in the Old Testament, to today's mock human sacrifices carried out by America's elite at Bohemian Grove.

People of faith should stand united; not in their one-world religion but against the Illuminati.

Jesus warned: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves."

Protocol 11:4: "The goyim are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock."
  --

James Perloff is author of several books; his latest is Truth Is a Lonely Warrior.
 

The Parasitical Elite – Defining The Shifting Enemy Of The Common Man

"Being of non-physical substance, they do not eat food as we define food. They do not get drunk on what we call alcohol. These entities feed upon fear and negative emotion. The tools they use to grow their food are found in the machinations of central banks, the CFR, warmongering corporations and a host of earthly minions, all dedicated to sowing fear and creating negative emotion within us. This is their food."

Michael T. Winter
Activist Post

Who are these people? Some will immediately chime in, “They aren't people at all!” Perhaps so...perhaps not. They go by many names; The Powers That Be, The Illuminati, The Freemasons, The Brotherhood of the Snake, The Universal Brotherhood, The Sinisteri are but a few. The broad term, Parasitical Elite, is more description than a branded label.

There is a designed ambiguity surrounding the Parasitical Elite. Through millennia, however, certain constants manifest themselves; they are as unavoidable as the age found in a person's eyes regardless of the best efforts of cosmetic surgery. Parasitical Elites, regardless who you think they are, are evil. 'Evil' is itself a subjective term, but in the broad context of the thought processes of non-psychopathic people, we can all agree on a universal definition of evil as the desire to do harm to others.

From before the time of Christ in ancient Sumeria, right up to present day, the Parasitical Elite have alternately appeared, disappeared and reappeared under different guises; in the form of secret societies, political ideologies and occult institutions. This is not accidental. Obfuscation is a pillar upon which their agenda for global domination rests.

The employment of the root word 'parasite' is accurate. Regardless of what they choose to be known as within any given epoch, they are parasites - they latch on to a host and drain it of whatever is required for the parasite to thrive.

How far the blinders have come off will usually help define what we consider to be the Parasitical Elite. For those newly awoken, the Parasitical Elite might be corporations, or even the Democratic or Republican party. At the sleep leaves one's eyes, the central bankers. At yet another, it might be the '13 Families', or the reptilian bloodlines, or the Nephilim. Or European royalty and nobility. At yet another, the Ashkenazim. For some, it's simply “The Jews”. Catholics. Organized religion. All of these are correct, in one fashion or another. And all of these are not correct - this is the nature of created ambiguity. Confusion is the Parasitical Elite's friend. If everyone is the bogeyman, then no one is the bogeyman. These parasites operate on many levels; attaching to races, institutions and ideologies until such time as they have consumed their micro host and move on to more fertile ground from which to ever realize their goal of global domination. From domination comes fear and negativity. We, humanity, are the primary host from which they seek to feed upon. They do so by creating and controlling instruments (nothing more, really) such as belief systems and political systems such as communism and socialism...'isms' that fight each other and create fear and death. Parasites depleting the host...us.

This article's title question still begs to be answered. Some might ask who they are. Others, with an eye to a larger canvass, might ask what they are. Are they aliens, as William Bramley, author of Gods of Eden believes? He makes a very convincing case to that effect. This worthy read will open anyone's eyes to a great unveiling of truths. Even if one cannot or will not subscribe to the alien theory convincingly posited, there is a great deal of historically accurate data pertaining to secret societies such as the Bavarian Illuminati, William of Orange, or the origins of the House of Windsor.

Many believe the Parasitical Elite are divine beings of evil origin. How they differ from aliens is a theological distinction that escapes me, but many will defend that argument. It is believed they have come to us or been cast from their place of origin, depending on what holy book or legend one ascribes to. Wherever they come from, they are here to feed upon negativity and fear. This rings especially loud when speaking of Satan and his demon horde. There is a library of Alexandria-esque proportions detailing the hierarchy for these entities, sub-categories of demons and angels, such as Nephilim, Seraphim's, demi-gods and demi-urges and the like. Beneath this blanket nestles a host of various mythologies and theological structures such as the Greek Gods, the Norse gods, and a great many non-western and tribal mythologies. Without intending to ruffle any feathers, a widely held belief claims modern, organized western religions are simply present day humanity's current theological lover. Will Christ, or Allah, or Shiva be spoken of in current context two thousand years from now? Perhaps, as they have survived that long already. But in five thousand years? Six thousand? Before answering a thunderously indignant “OF COURSE!”, ask yourself if you can name the primary Gods of Sumer, or even Egypt. Most cannot, yet they were deities that shaped the course of our history. Many will argue that these deities of antiquity have been re branded into the deities we worship today, and I will not argue that assertion, finding it to be spot on.

In defining the Parasitical Elite, dipping in the shallow end of the pool, a person's opinion of the elite goes no farther than politicians and businessmen.

Deeper into water, reaching above the waist, the opinion of who the Parasitical Elite are changes. The veil is lifted a bit and central banksters, the multi-trillion Rothschild clan or their evil and malevolent offspring the Rockefeller's become identified. Subsidiary evils might include Wall Street denizens, the spider webs of global corporations, the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderbergers, Skull & Bones or the Council of Rome; all evil, all psychopathic in leadership, membership and objectives; yet all are just clothes of different cuts, emanating from the same wardrobe. They are, indeed, but garments draped upon evil entities; the physical manifestations required to give corporeal substance to these malevolent entities, the better to aide in their ongoing campaign of destruction and control.

To swim in the deep end is to lose purchase with our physical reality, much as one must tread water to remain afloat. The universe is a big place. Infinite? Maybe. Do we inhabit just one universe in an ocean of universes? Perhaps. Science has proven that within the broad electromagnetic spectrum, our decidedly limited scope of perception perceives a tiny fraction of what is known to exist. If we can allow there is a vast spectrum of energy and existence we are not privy to, then we must allow the possibility of invisible (undetectable within the scope of our visible electromagnetic spectrum) entities existing all around us. Some will call these unseen entities spirits, demons, ghosts or Gods. Given (we now know) there is more unknown than known, we cannot rule out they do not exist. It is more probable and logical to allow that they do exist. Being of non-physical substance, they do not eat food as we define food. They do not get drunk on what we call alcohol. These entities feed upon fear and negative emotion. The tools they use to grow their food are found in the machinations of central banks, the CFR, warmongering corporations and a host of earthly minions, all dedicated to sowing fear and creating negative emotion within us. This is their food. This is the harvest they seek to reap, and our planet is the field. We, as individuals are the kernels. But they don't want wheat - they want the chaff. Where there is wheat, they seek to create chaff. It is the more fertile from which to germinate fear and insecurity, the consumption of which only makes them stronger.

Allowing there is a yin and yang to everything, a universal balance if you will, then the obvious conclusion to be drawn is that love is the antidote to hate; that positive emotion is the antidote to negative emotion.

There is a universal battle being waged for our little sparks of energy each of us possesses. One side, via the trappings of various earthly instruments, seeks to entrap us in fear, while the other side seeks to envelop us in love. Negative entities are decidedly more proactive, while the forces of light, no less concerned or desirous of our energy, remain in stasis; it is only by embracing love that one can become part of it. Positive light and love cannot be accepted in the form of deception, whereas fear can. Fortunately, all but the darkest heart instinctively will shy from evil. As social psychologists would have it, roughly 4 % of the human population will embrace evil. A brighter outlook on this is that 96% will not seek out evil, but must have it inserted. This is where the Parasitical Elite shine via their earthly instruments. Industries created to promote lust, greed, covetousness, materialism, pornography, inebriation and a boatload of other human weaknesses; these are the keys that open the door to fear and negativity. Those lesser and mis-diagnosed definitions of Parasitical Elites found in the shallow waters of the newly awakened are only tools created by the true Parasitical Elites...tools designed to separate us, or our spiritual energy, to be precise, from the light and positive energy that love emits.

So, at the end of the day, the only way to defeat these Parasitical Elites is to reject their wars, their moral corruptions and other means designed and projected on us daily in an effort to keep us from the light of love. Darkness flees before light. One doesn't go into a well lit room and ignite a candle of darkness to banish the light. Sadly, these Parasitical Elite have used religion for eons as the primary vehicle to create despair. War is evil incarnate. There is no good or justified war. There is simply war. Christians, Jews and Muslims, take heed! Your violent defense of your faith is little more than fuel to stoke the furnace of evil. Peace is love...to embrace peace is to embrace the light. As Gandhi said, “There is no path to peace, peace is the path.

Recently by Michael T. Winter

• The Dichotomy of Mainstream Media vs. the Alternative Media
• Is the FEMA Region III Alert a Red Herring?
• Chemtrails - Origins and Implications

Surviving Armageddon - Peter Kling w/Exopolotics.com

We, the people of this world, know we have been lied to by government and religion. We have been reduced to little more than slaves, controlled by the rich and powerful. Conspiracy theories regarding the command of power and world domination are abundant, but few are accurate or can even answer the simple question of why this is all happening.Using history, science and Bible prophecies, Letters to Earth ... You Can Survive Armageddon! offers logical insights and explanations to the questions that burn in our minds. It explains where we come from, why we are here and what our future is going to be.Author Peter Kling began his Bible education at the age of five and never really stopped. As he trained to become a scientist, he began to discover answers to many of his biblical questions. He is working on a follow-up book that will explore humanity's connection with a higher power and the spiritual world. He lives in Milford, Pennsylvania, and has been in several different editions of Who's Who throughout his educative and professional life.

The Rothschilds - ROYAL & PAPAL Knights - Jesuit Controlled

alan lamont
Sep 11, 2013

The Jesuit Vatican New World Order

For those who doubt the balance of power between the Rothschilds, British Royalty & the Papacy, I have compiled the following collection of information showing verifiable Papal & Royal knighthoods bestowed on the Rothschilds. These do not include any deduced or hearsay knighthoods. Note that in the Grand scheme of things these knighthoods are not even from the most elite of such orders, e.g. the Garter or the Bath to name but two.

I would draw your attention to the two following articles which reveal many of the covert connections in European (& thus international) finance, politics, military & intelligence. These give a taste of the extent of influence of Catholic & Papal-loyal elites, including knighthood orders such as the SMOM (Knights of Malta) & Franco-Neapolitan branch of the Constantinian Order. The Venetian & Genoese aristocracy & their so called Black Nobility descendants are given some context here too:
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3205_italy_black_prince.html
http://www.isgp.eu/organisations/Le_Cercle.htm

There are other good sources that touch on the Vatican’s wealth, including David Yallop’s “In God’s Name”

(which is by no means an anti-Catholic polemic).
How anyone can think that the Rothschilds are the pinnacle of power is beyond me. Very powerful? Yes. The mind behind the all-seeing eye? No way. We have to look much deeper beyond these Kabbalistically-minded businessmen. While not wishing to diminish the truth about their influence, we must keep things in perspective.

Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, former head of the now British Rothschild banking interests (now united with the French Rothschild banking interests & overseen since 2003 by David René de Rothschild) being interviewed on intelligence-controlled television & his son David Mayer de Rothschild on the Alex Jones radio show? Hilarious.Lord Jacob (the 4th Baron) Rothschild was made a Member of the Queen’s Order of Merit   THE TRUTH IS THE ROTHSCHILDS ARE BANKERS FOR THE BLACK JESUIT POPE WHO ALSO CONTROLS THE QUEENS CROWN EMPIRE AND THE ORDER OF THE GARTER

(personally selected & bestowed by the Monarch, this is directly below the rank of Knight Grand Commander of the Order of the Bath in terms of honour) in 2002 & Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire in 1998. Note that his title of Baron Rothschild is a UK title going back to 1885. He is also – & perhaps confusingly – the 5th Baronet Rothschild, a UK title going back to 1847 & the current Baron von Rothschild, an Austrian Empire title dating back to 1822. We should also note that in 1985 he was made a Commander of the Order of Henry the Navigator of Portugal:
http://www.thepeerage.com/p5338.htm#i53379
His father Lord Victor (the 3rd Baron) Rothschild was made a Knight Grand Cross of the British Empire in 1975 & was also a Knight of the Queen’s Order of St John:
See: http://www.thepeerage.com/p7108.htm#i71075

The Queen, as Sovereign of the Order of St John (& of the Order of Sts Michael & George, which just recently bestowed an Honorary Knighthood on Jesuit/Vatican asset & Freemason Shimon Peres) is the head of a franchise of the Pope’s Order of Malta, the SMOM. Thus she is a Dame of Malta. As the Rothschilds defer to Queen, so do they both defer to the Papacy & ultimately to the Jesuit General.
For good databases of Sir Evelyn & Lord Jacob’s (& Lord Victor’s) New World Order-related connections, see:
http://isgp.eu/organisations/introduction/PEHI_Jacob_de_Rothschild_bio.htm
http://www.isgp.eu/organisations/introduction/PEHI_Evelyn_de_Rothschild_bio.htm

There is also a bio for the French Baron Edmond de Rothschild there:
http://isgp.eu/organisations/introduction/Wik_Baron_Edmond_de_Rothschild.htm
The current Lord Rothschild’s son, Nat, has no such honours & nor does his cousin David Mayer de Rothschild, nor does the united French & British Rothschilds banking head David René de Rothschild. And nor have any of their other respective paternal ancestors other than those listed above, as far as my research has turned up:
http://www.thepeerage.com/p5341.htm#i53407
http://www.thepeerage.com/p19566.htm#i195653 http://www.thepeerage.com/p19539.htm#i195386

Note that the Great Great Great Great (yes, that’s four Greats!) Grandfather of Lord Jacob Rothschild & the Great Great Great Grandfather of Sir Evelyn & David René de Rothschild – Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild international banking dynasty, was made an Imperial (Holy Roman Empire) Crown Agent in 1800:
http://www.thepeerage.com/p19531.htm#i195307

Evelyn de Rothschild’s Grandfather Leopold de Rothschild was invested as a Commander, Royal Victorian Order (C.V.O.) in 1902. Leopold’s brother Sir Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the Great Grandfather of Lord Jacob Rothschild, was invested as a Knight Grand Cross, Royal Victorian Order (G.C.V.O.), also in 1902. Leopold & Nathan Mayer’s parents were Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild and Charlotte de Rothschild. Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild was senior partner of NM Rothschild and Sons in 1836.
http://www.thepeerage.com/p19553.htm#i195528
http://www.thepeerage.com/p7037.htm#i70366
http://www.thepeerage.com/p19553.htm#i195523

Lionel Nathan’s father was – confusingly – another Nathan Mayer & the son of Mayer Amschel. This Nathan Mayer was the ancestor of both Sir Evelyn & Lord Jacob. His brother (another of the original (in)famous five sons of Mayer Amschel) Jame Mayer was the ancestor of David René de Rothschild.

I will note here that at the bottom of this focus on the Rothschilds I have selected some career & business-related information from Wikipedia to get some up-to-date, mainstream information on the prominent Rothschilds to use as a quick comparison of one family member with another & for comparing with more conspiracy-orientated material.

Now for some bankers information more directly related to the American side of things, note that US financial magnate JP Morgan (who escaped death by not going on the Titanic that he was booked to travel on) died appropriately enough in Rome & was a Knight of the Papal-loyal House of Savoy’s Order of Sts Maurice & Lazarus:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.P._Morgan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Saints_Maurice_and_Lazarus

Full article HERE

"Christian Swingers" website - Fornicate Without Guilt, And With God's Blessings!

(words cannot describe this . . . we shall see much worse in the near future, I'd say . . . I've always felt that all these "Christian dating services that have been being advertized for the last several years was designed to break up families . .  at least this one is honest about their agenda )

http://www.christianswingers.com/

WHAT DOES JOHN HAGEE REALLY WANT?

By Chuck Baldwin

June 27, 2013
NewsWithViews.com

John Hagee, and many other evangelical preachers, constantly beat the war drums. Without ceasing, they encourage America’s political leaders to wage non-stop wars of aggression--especially in the Middle East. They constantly trumpet America’s unconstitutional interventions in the Middle East with terms not unlike those used by militant Muslims. Hagee’s pro-war fanaticism is so extreme one must wonder how much he is being paid by the Israeli lobby. My guess is it’s a bunch.

Much of this Christian war fever is due to a convoluted interpretation of Scripture--especially prophetic Scripture. While I will leave most of this discussion for another day, let me simply say that whatever God plans to do in regard to the reestablishment of the Davidic Kingdom, it has precious little to do with the atheistic, apostate government currently headquartered in Tel Aviv. And Hagee, himself, teaches apostasy when he declares that Jewish people today have a special covenant with God and do not need to come to faith in Jesus Christ in order to be saved, and when he says that Jesus never even claimed to be Christ (Messiah).

Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father but by me.” (John 14:6 KJV) Now, either Jesus or John Hagee told the truth. I’ll take the word of Jesus. Plus, Mr. Hagee apparently forgot Simon Peter’s confession, which Jesus said was due to a revelation from God the Father, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.” (Matthew 16:16 KJV)

So, what is it that Hagee and the rest really want? Perpetual war? Total genocide? A global New World Order with the likes of G.W. Bush or Barack Obama at the helm? What do they really want? Do they really have such an inflated view of themselves that they truly believe that they are going to manipulate what God does or doesn’t do regarding the fulfillment of end time events? Is God their servant? Is God Israel’s servant? Is God America’s servant? Balderdash! God is no man’s (or country’s) servant.

I wonder what these warmonger-preachers think about all the “blowback” from these illegal and immoral wars of aggression that G.W. Bush (and now Barack Obama) has led us into. Not only are these wars provoking people all over the world against us and doing more to recruit volunteers for militant extremists in the Middle East than anything Al Qaeda could do on their own, they are having catastrophic results on missionary work.

Now think this through: these warmongering evangelicals beat the war drums; they encourage the young men from their churches to go off and fight these “holy” wars; they work tirelessly to elect pro-war politicians; and they twist Old Testament Scripture to fit these modern crusades. Then, the politicians whom the warmongers helped elect send the US military to invade, bomb, and kill hundreds of thousands of people, the vast majority of whom are innocent people. After which, these same warmonger-preachers get up in their pulpits and cry and weep about how we need to send missionaries to preach the Gospel to the same people they just got done trying to annihilate.

Exactly who is it that the missionaries are supposed to reach? The ones lucky enough to escape death and destruction from US bombers and drone attacks, I guess. And exactly what is the message our missionaries are supposed to deliver? “I’m from America, and I’m here to tell you about the love of God.” Oh, that is going to play really well with the loved ones of those family members we just destroyed.

I’ve had so many missionaries tell me how difficult it is for them to try to minister to people around the world today; and the chief reason is the bully reputation that America has built over the past several decades.

Furthermore, do these warmongering evangelicals really want to deal with the fact that we now have over 23 veterans and active-duty military personnel committing suicide EVERY DAY? That equates to more fighting men dying from self-inflicted wounds than from wounds received in the wars they are asked to fight. This is a first in US history. Is John Hagee interested in why so many of our fighting men are killing themselves?

Just recently, an Iraq War veteran killed himself and left a sad and compelling suicide-letter explaining why he ended his life. The letter was posted with the family’s permission. This young soldier was engaged in over 400 combat missions as a machine-gunner in the turret of a Humvee. He was also involved in the interrogation of countless Iraqis. In the letter, the soldier said, “The simple truth is this: During my first deployment, I was made to participate in things, the enormity of which is hard to describe. War crimes, crimes against humanity. Though I did not participate willingly, and made what I thought was my best effort to stop these events, there are some things that a person simply can not come back from. I take some pride in that, actually, as to move on in life after being part of such a thing would be the mark of a sociopath in my mind. These things go far beyond what most are even aware of.

“To force me to do these things and then participate in the ensuing coverup is more than any government has the right to demand. Then, the same government has turned around and abandoned me. They offer no help, and actively block the pursuit of gaining outside help via their corrupt agents at the DEA. Any blame rests with them.”

The distraught soldier went on to say, “Is it any wonder then that the latest figures show 22 veterans killing themselves each day? That is more veterans than children killed at Sandy Hook, every single day. Where are the huge policy initiatives? Why isn’t the president standing with those families at the state of the union? Perhaps because we were not killed by a single lunatic, but rather by his own system of dehumanization, neglect, and indifference.

“It leaves us to where all we have to look forward to is constant pain, misery, poverty, and dishonor. I assure you that, when the numbers do finally drop, it will merely be because those who were pushed the farthest are all already dead.

“And for what? Bush’s religious lunacy? Cheney’s ever growing fortune and that of his corporate friends? Is this what we destroy lives for?”

See the report and the soldier’s complete suicide-letter: Iraq Vet Kills Himself After Being Ordereed To Commit War Crimes

What was the soldier’s lament? He was forced to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity. He was forced by the government to cover up these crimes. His government abandoned him in his hour of need. His pain and guilt was more than he could bear. The soldier’s own words were that his was “Not suicide, but a mercy killing.”

Mr. Hagee and the rest of you warmongering evangelicals out there, is this soldier’s suicide (and the suicides of over 23 active-duty and military veterans every day) what you had in mind when you beat the drums for America’s undeclared, unconstitutional wars of aggression? This young soldier saw the reality of these wars up close and personal--and he didn’t like what he saw. And don’t try to brush this off by saying it’s always been this way. No it hasn’t! We didn’t have suicides like this during World War I or World War II. Whatever the politics back then was or wasn’t, those were lawfully declared wars in which our men knew what they were fighting for. They went in; they fought; they came home.

The war we are fighting in the Middle East is now America’s longest war, and there is no end in sight. Bush and Obama have made perpetual war an official US policy. In addition, this “War on Terror” has transformed the American people from citizens into suspects--every last one of us. Military drones by the tens of thousands are, or soon will be, flying over the skies of America. The American citizenry is being spied on relentlessly. Two super spy centers are currently being built: one in southern Utah and one near San Antonio, Texas.

These super spy centers are designed primarily to spy on the American people. Liberties once protected by the Constitution and Bill of Rights are now publicly and blatantly abused. And evangelicals such as John Hagee say nary a word of protest. Instead, they continue to support and promote this so-called “War on Terror.” At what cost, Mr. Hagee? At what cost?

Hundreds of thousands of innocents are being killed; animosity against the United States is growing exponentially; in an effort to keep our country at war, our economy is being overburdened and overtaxed to the point of no return; in the name of the “War on Terror,” America is on the verge of becoming a giant police state; we are inciting China and Russia into nuclear war; and America’s military veterans are killing themselves more frequently than are enemy bullets. Is this what you want, Mr. Hagee? Is this really what you want? 

PROOF that Great Britain owns the USA

 (I'd heard about this type of info before, but shrugged it off . . . this PROVES IT, imo . . .be sure to read the last few paragraphs)

http://www.natural-person.ca/pdf/Great_Britain_owns_USA.PDF

By: Stephen Kimbol Ames

Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:

S.I. 1997 NO. 1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty in pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:

"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1778/made

Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law.

Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.'

What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15). Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace (1738) * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.

On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money that is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not incredible that the King funded both sides of the War? But there was more work that needed to be done. Now the Articles of Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12 " All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged."

Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were not done yet. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States came to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so-called founding
fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt. On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approved the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote. On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was titled - An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and created the Districts. If you don't believe it look it up.

The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we've got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto (by the fact itself) a citizen of the United States.

A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject.
What you think is a State is in reality a Corporation, in other words, a Person (artificial- person). "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272" Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no States, just Corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a Corporation. A Corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.

Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.
Article Six Section One keeps the loans from the King valid it states; All Debts
contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two that states “Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States”. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it.

The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank (just like the Federal Reserve Bank) of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States. Now the creditors of the United States, which included the King, wanted to be paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the Militia to collect the tax, which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes from the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the “floundering” fathers and their posterity and Great Britain.

America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!! If you don't believe it read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states, "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) that states that it is the Militia's job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16). It states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States. The Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is there to collect our substance. As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves.

If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty of Amity,
Commerce and Navigation”. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794, which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was, he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King wanted them here.

Here is the key to were this started: Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactments and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher."

We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. The written credit agreement -- the Jewish Shetar is a lien on all property (realty) and today it's called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that Great Britain owns the Jews and the Jews are in charge of the Banking system.

We are living under the Babylonian Talmud, it is where all of our problems originate. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist.

Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below. "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520.

You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you.

Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of examples:
"The primary control and custody of an infant is with the government" Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
" Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the State." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor. "The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under government." Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481

Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government. All taxpayers have an Individual Master File that is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series that shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.

The form that is supposed to be used for this is Form 8288, IRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 Form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a.

These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred
Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K.?

Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so-called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to its udders? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all, breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the other slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor? You are called an extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don't want to be a slave. But, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they want bow down and worship corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not the problem, it is the other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be- slaves were gone. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope would not even exist,
because no one would acknowledge them. I for a matter of fact, think that those who are in power are also tired of the slaves. All the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free healthcare, free education, free housing and they beg those who are in power to disarm them. I do agree that a slave should not have access to a firearm. How can you disagree with the government passing out birth control? I hope the breeding of slaves stops or at the very least slows down. You see we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope.

Now to Rome. "Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations." Article (3)Treaty of Varona (1822)
If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world?

The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bull of 1455 and 1492.

I could go on and on, his is just the tip of the iceberg. Don't let this information scare you because without it you cannot be free. You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations that are nothing but fictional entities that have been placed into your mind, you will understand that your slavery was because you believed a lie.

This Christmas, People Around World Will Celebrate The Birth Of Obama As God Incarnate Instead Of Jesus

raidersnewsupdate.com

Figurines of President Barack Obama are appearing in Nativity scenes in shops in Naples, Italy for the Christmas season. Craftsman Marco Ferrigno told Reuters on Nov. 7 that Obama’s reelection sparked the production. "Every time a major event occurs we create a new figurine, and today after Obama's victory, we have made a new figurine of Obama and will put him in our ideal Nativity scene,” Ferrigno said. Reuters reported that the shop keepers said bargain hunters could get a “big discount” on figurines of GOP candidate Mitt Romney. Italian fans of Obama said his likeness in the nativity scenes is a portrayal of how important his role is in today's world, according to Reuters.

source article HERE

Mayors thrashed for talk of Chick-fil-A ban

WND EXCLUSIVE

'It should be a wake-up call to every American who believes in liberty and freedom'

by Chelsea Schilling

When Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy said he supports biblical marriage between a man and a woman – rather than homosexual marriage – several U.S. mayors threatened to ban the fast-food chain from coming to their cities.

But would such a move be legal?

Liberty Counsel President Mathew Staver told WND’s Greg Corombos that city bans on Chick-fil-A would be unconstitutional.

He said this reaction proves that homosexual activists are militantly intolerant and are interested in intimidating and silencing critics rather than engaging in an actual debate.

Boycotts were called, homosexuals threatened to hold kiss-ins at Chick-fil-A restaurants and at least three big-city mayors blasted the fast-food chain: Boston Mayor Thomas Menino, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and San Francisco Mayor Edwin Lee.

Emanuel declared that “Chick-fil-A values are not Chicago values.” Emanuel’s spokeswoman later said the mayor wouldn’t stop Chick-fil-A from opening a new restaurant.

In a letter to Cathy, Menino wrote, “There is no place for discrimination on Boston’s Freedom Trail and no place for your company alongside it.” Menino later said he was expressing his own opinion and couldn’t stop Chick-fil-A from coming to Boston.

Lee tweeted: “Closest (hash)ChickFilA to San Francisco is 40 miles away & I strongly recommend that they not try to come any closer.”

Staver said threats to ban Chick-fil-A from cities are irresponsible, and blocking a business from opening due to the personal beliefs of its leader would be discriminatory and, therefore, illegal.

“It’s a wake-up call to all of us who have biblical values and share these moral principles that natural marriage is a union of one man, one woman,” Staver said. “[W]e’re facing a very intolerant movement that wants to silence biblical views and views on natural marriage and morality.

“Here we have the president of Chick-fil-A, a privately owned, family run business, who expresses in an interview – based upon the Bible – that natural marriage is the union of one man and one woman. As a result of that, a firestorm breaks out and you have government officials, such as the mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, and the mayor of Boston, Mayor Tom Menino, and you also have the alderman in Chicago, all of whom are saying that Chick-fil-A cannot do business in their cities – that they’re not going to allow them to have a business permit, zoning permit. They’re going to block them from having a Chick-fil-A restaurant.
“That’s absolutely outrageous, and it should be a wake-up call to every American and everyone who believes in liberty and freedom.”

Staver said the belief that marriage is a union of one man and one woman has been shared by various cultures and religions throughout history.

“It’s common sense and part of who we are as Americans and as individuals around the world,” he said. “Now Mayor Rahm Emanuel says that those values are incompatible with the values of Chicagoans. They may be incompatible with Rahm Emanuel’s values, but they’re certainly compatible with most of Chicagoans and most of America.”

He noted that many legal professionals have condemned the mayors’ threats to block Chick-fil-A from their cities.

“These statements should not be made by government officials,” he argued. “These statements are the height of discrimination, and they simply undermine the Constitution. They are absolutely uncalled for, and these individuals ought to be ashamed that they even made these kinds of statements against Chick-fil-A, Mr. Cathy or anyone else who hold those views while they were in their government position.”

Staver noted that UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh has written an article saying the mayors have opened up their cities to criticism and even litigation because of their threats. He said even the ACLU condemned the statements. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg – despite his own support of same-sex marriage – said he disagrees with his fellow mayors.

Bloomberg said on his weekly radio show on WOR that it is wrong for the government “to look at somebody’s political views and decide whether or not they can live in the city, or operate a business in the city, or work for somebody in the city.”

Even Richard Socarides, a New York lawyer and former Clinton White House adviser on homosexual “rights” who is calling for a boycott of Chick-fil-A, told the Associated Press cities cannot regulate speech by denying business permits based on political beliefs.

Staver said, “Every person from left to right and anything in between – within the legal arena, law professors and public-interest organizations – has said that these are outrageous, they’re uncalled for, and they cross the line. Government officials should not censor what you’re doing, in your speech, in your private views, and therefore try to hold over you an opposition to even do business.”

Staver warned that the homosexual-marriage movement is not about “tolerance.”

“This is not about what two people want to do in the privacy of their own home,” he said. “This is an ideological clash of unprecedented proportions. There will be one winner, and there will be one loser. …
“I’m not optimistic that it’s going to tone down any time soon. But what I am saying is that we need to be vigilant, and Liberty Council is ready to not only educate but also to defend the line. This is a battle that we cannot lose … This is a battle that is absolutely intent on silencing biblical viewpoints.”

 

The Vatican and Alien Connection / Petrus Romanus - 04/04/2012 Tom Horn & Steve Quayle/OmegaMan

 Apr 11, 2012 by urupiper

 

 Steve and Tom Horn guest on Omega Man Radio, Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Topic: Vatican And Alien Disclosure Timed With Petrus Romanus

Discovery of vast prehistoric works built by Giants?
By David E. Flynn
"The size and scope of David Flynn's Teohuanaco discovery simply surpasses comprehension. Mammoth traces of intelligence carved in stone and covering hundreds of square miles. For those who understand what they are seeing here for the first time, this could indeed be the strongest evidence ever found of prehistoric engineering by those who were known and feared throughout the ancient world as gods. 
~ Thomas Horn"
http://www.raidersnewsupdate.com/giants.htm
PETRUS ROMANUS (Pt 17)
http://www.raidersnewsupdate.com/petrus-seventeen.htm

http://www.raidersnewsupdate.com/

http://www.stevequayle.com/

OMEGA MAN RADIO 1
Episode 622: The Vatican and Alien Connection / Petrus Romanus 
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/omegamanradio/2012/04/05/episode-622vatican-alie...