Sunday, January 16, 2011

Huge ring appears over Australia, is HAARP involved?

Pakalert Press
January 14, 2011

colin andrews

After receiving an urgent e-mail from a contact in Australia informing me of bizarre weather on the weather satellite imagery, I checked out the data and just hours later more strangeness. I am waiting to hear from the Australian Government’s weather bureau for their own explanation.

“There is very strange weather happening here – please check”

Image

A contact in Australia just alerted me to what he describes as “very strange weather taking place over the south west of Australia”. He told me to go to the national weather satellite images if I could not open the images he attached (See left). By the time I had discovered the e-mail and checked, the large clearly defined ring had mostly dissipated but still was just visible on a time loop which was spiraling counter clockwise (Low Pressure system).

Image

The images above is what my contact sent which shows a wide band ring covering many hundreds of miles across the south west of Australia with a small dot (presumably cloud) shown just right of center.

I saved the loop of the area when I checked the site several hours later but unfortunately it was encrypted not to permit this. The loop is not now on the site but the satellite image taken at 16:30 UTC is also very interesting. It shows a very large rotating over the western Australia where the mysterious large ring appeared from which a small but brief condense trail formed off the coastline and from the center what had been the huge ring a series of what appears to be three mini spiraling arms are seen moving out of the area, moving north east. This is one of those rare occasions when I could buy weather experimentation effects or other experiments
being performed by HAARP are being observed. It is hoped to receive an explanation from the Australian Government Weather Bureau for these series of strange effects.

Image

Only remains of the huge ring now moving away north east as several small spiraling arms. Satellite Image by Australian Government.

Other similar circles and rings seen on radar http://www.colinandrews.net/OtherCircles.html

Jared Loughner's Rabbi Stephanie Aaron Makes Monkeys Of US & Canadian Media

(this news will probably never be touched by 95% of anyone trying to figure out what really happened in Tuscon . . . it is probably key . . .)

CraigCobbAdventureJ | January 10, 2011




Saturday, January 15, 2011

Five Sinister Reasons for the Tucson "Massacre"

The Witch Hunt Begins: Citizen Spy Network Targets Political Speech and Gun Owners

THElNFOWARRlOR | January 14, 2011



A plethora of tyrannical campaigns have been initiated and designed to break up communities and turn citizens against one another. The justifications for these fascist programs are always a matter of national security. The real reason for these programs and even the events that brought them into existence is to set up a police control grid.

HOW TO GET PEOPLE TO SERIOUSLY LOOK AT CHEMTRAILS






2011 Jan 8 from Molly Calcagno, molly.calcagno@gmail.com

At the beginning of this summer, as I was traveling from Portland, Oregon to North Dakota, I became aware of aerosol spraying because I had to watch it for too many hours to ignore the issue when the evidence is right under my nose (well actually right above it). Ever since my mind has been haunted by the topic. I can't sit back and do nothing, because it is too aggravating to watch people turn their heads and hide from the issue when it is compromising their quality of life and destroying the chance for life to continue in the future.

I have tried several approaches to getting others aware of the issue and have found a method that is by far more affective than the other methods I have tried. People are reluctant to care about something unless they can directly relate to the issue. So, rather than bring up chemtrails at all, I have started to spark peoples interest by asking questions. Everyone around me complains about being short with people for no reason and having lack of concentration. Many people are getting similar symptoms, such as lingering colds, inability to breathe, the flu that lasts for a week, and a mysterious rash that doctors cannot diagnose. I evaluate which symptom I think the person is suffering from the most and then suddenly they are interested in listening to a possible explanation regarding why they are feeling that way.

I have looked into research that proves the source of many of these ailments is either barium or aluminum. Then people become curious as to how they would be overexposed to such things. Only then do I bring up the topic of aerosol spraying.

Foreclosure chaos in US after court voids banks' seizure of homes because of lax mortgage paperwork



By Daily Mail Reporter
8th January 2011

Foreclosures in the U.S. have been plunged into doubt after a court voided the seizure of two homes in what could prove a key ruling.

Bank shares fell, dragging down markets, after the decision by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusett against Wells Fargo & Co and US Bancorp.

Judges decided their seizure of two homes was void because they had failed to show they held the mortgages at the time of foreclosure.

The court case is among the earliest to address the validity of foreclosures conducted without full documentation.

Wells Fargo & Co

Blocked: Wells Fargo & Co and US Bancorp lost a court case over the foreclosures on two properties

The issue prompted an uproar last year and led to lenders including Bank of American and JP Morgan temporarily stopping seizing homes.

Courts in other U.S. states are considering similar cases, and all 50 state attorneys general are examining whether lenders are forcing people out of their homes improperly.

The decision may also threaten banks' ability to package mortgages into securities, including whether loans that were transferred improperly might need to be bought back.

Wells Fargo and U.S. Bancorp lacked authority to foreclose after having 'failed to make the required showing that they were the holders of the mortgages at the time of foreclosure,' Justice Ralph Gants wrote for a unanimous court.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1345295/Foreclosure-chaos-US-court-voids-banks-seizure-homes-lax-mortgage-paperwork.html#ixzz1B7FkZYOY

Friday, January 14, 2011

Tim Geithner Says The United States Is Insolvent

The Daily Bail

Michael S. Rozeff

Geithner Says U.S. Insolvent

The U.S. government is insolvent. Who says so? Timothy F. Geithner, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. Geithner sent a letter to Congress on Jan. 6, 2011 asking for the debt limit to be raised. If it is not raised, he warned, the U.S. will default on its debt.

In his words:

  • "Never in our history has Congress failed to increase the debt limit when necessary. Failure to raise the limit would precipitate a default by the United States."
He didn’t say that the government will be inconvenienced. He didn’t say that the government would be forced to muddle through by delaying payments, raising taxes, and cutting non-obligatory programs and services. He said the government will default. This means that the government doesn’t have enough cash to pay its obligations to the many and sundry persons to whom it owes cash unless Congress authorizes an issue of even more debt.

After the government issues the new debt, its overall debt will be even higher than before. Unless its obligations that require cash payments are reduced, or unless it finds new sources of revenue, or unless the interest rates that it pays decline, the same situation will surely occur again and occur even faster because its overall debt will have risen. It will run short of cash to pay its obligations.

Suppose that you had a debt of $10,000 that required a payment of $500 in order to stave off your creditors’ seizing your assets. Suppose that you didn’t have the $500. One way out would be to borrow $500 from a new lender and use that $500 to pay off the old lenders. That buys you time. However, now you have debts of $10,500. You have to find ways of lowering this or else you will again be faced with an even worse situation.

You are approaching insolvency when you begin to run out of new lenders who are willing to add to your debt. The willing lenders dry up because they know that they have to get in line to get their promised payments while you continually seek out new borrowers, all the while making your situation worse and worse.

Knowing their precarious position, the new lenders are likely to demand rising default risk premiums.

That means they demand higher interest rates.

That means your cash payment obligations go up. That hastens your approach to insolvency.

Insolvency occurs when you cannot find enough cash from any source, even new lenders, in order to make required payments.

The U.S. is approaching insolvency, according to its Treasury Secretary. He didn’t put the matter in precisely that way, but he put it in words that are as close as you can get to it. He said that the U.S. would default, and its only way out at this moment is to issue more debt.

The increases in the debt limit have necessarily accompanied the increase in the government’s overall debt. Those increases have been especially astonishing in the last 10 years. The ceiling is now $14.29 trillion. The ceiling was $5.73 trillion in September of 2001. That’s a growth rate of over 10 percent a year.

A few months back, Laurence Kotlikoff wrote that "The U.S. is bankrupt." Using the government’s numbers properly labeled, he found that the U.S. fiscal gap, which is the difference between the present value of projected spending and revenues, is $202 trillion. An IMF study of the U.S. finances found that it would have to double taxes to close its fiscal gap. This is an impossibility. It would destroy the struggling economy.

Geithner’s statement confirms those of other analysts outside of the U.S. government.

According to Kotlikoff, the government’s sixty-year "massive Ponzi scheme" will end when there are not enough revenues to pay for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. He sees large benefit cuts, large tax increases, and high inflation ahead when the government seeks to survive.

How will the U.S. extricate itself from this situation? That’s a matter of speculation because there are many interacting variables involved. There are lots of ifs, ands, and buts.

Full story HERE

Congress quietly prepares to renew Patriot Act


RawStory

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) has introduced a little-noticed bill that intends to once again renew controversial provisions of the Bush administration's USA Patriot Act that are due to expire this year.

When the act was first signed into law, Congress put in some "sunset" provisions to quiet the concerns of civil libertarians, but they were ignored by successive extensions. Unfortunately, those concerns proved to be well founded, and a 2008 Justice Department report confirmed that the FBI regularly abused their ability to obtain personal records of Americans without a warrant.

The only real sign of strong opposition to the act was in 2005, when a Democratic threat to filibuster its first renewal was overcome by Senate Republicans.

Since the bill introduced by Rogers on Jan. 5 was virtually identical to the extension passed last year, its passage was seen as likely.

"Given the very limited number of days Congress has in session before the current deadline, and the fact that the bill’s Republican sponsor is only seeking another year, I think it’s safe to read this as signaling an agreement across the aisle to put the issue off yet again," the conservative-leaning Cato Institute's Julian Sanchez wrote.

"In the absence of a major scandal, though, it’s hard to see why we should expect the incentives facing legislators to be vastly different a year from now," he added. "I’d love to be proven wrong, but I suspect this is how reining in the growth of the surveillance state becomes an item perpetually on next year’s agenda."

As senator, Obama promised to support reforming the Patriot Act, but voted in favor of extending it in 2005 and 2008. Similarly, he signed last year's extension into law with little fanfare. FBI and Department of Justice officials had consistently argued that restricting their blanket authority to conduct warrantless searches would harm national security.

Candidate Obama said in 2007 that if he were elected president there would be "no more National Security Letters [NSL's] to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime" because "that is not who we are, and it is not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists."

Much like Obama's vow to close the Guantanamo Bay military prison, the use of NSL's has also continued. Most recently, Obama's Department of Justice sent an NSL to micro-blogging site Twitter, seeking information on all 635,561 users who followed secrets outlet WikiLeaks -- a list that included Raw Story.

Obama's campaign website insisted that he has consistently said he would support a Patriot Act extension that strengthens civil liberties.

Action on his campaign pledge had yet to emerge by the start of 2011, and no significant reforms were reflected in the newly Rep. Rogers' extension.

Former Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI), perhaps the Senate's strongest opponent of the Patriot Act, was defeated by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) in the 2010 mid-term elections.

Ever Learning And Never Able To Come To The Knowledge Of The Truth, Transhumanists Say There Is "Middle Ground" For Altering What It Means To Be Human

(in these demons' minds, any humans who are not part of the "singularity" will at least be fortunate to have the same rights and privileges as apes . . .)


With an appreciation for these possible injustices, James Hughes has outlined the importance of “democratic transhumanism.” He predicts a happy future, in which, united by their common personhood, humans, chimps, and posthumans would have common rights and protections. As Agar notes, however, it is unclear how this moral epiphany about the importance of common personhood would be obtained. Chimps and great apes today are denied political participation and protection, and even animal-rights activists prioritize human welfare over animal welfare in lifeboat situations or other hard cases. There is much to admire in Humanity’s End. Agar argues strenuously and analytically for the precautionary principle without falling back on arguments about “playing God” or mystical assertions about what is natural or what the essential nature of humanity might be.

Link to source article HERE

National Public Radio Sees The Coming Singularity As Humanity's LAST INVENTION. "This Will Be Much Worse Than The Terminator Movies"


KASTE: They call this the A.I. singularity. Because the intelligence could grow so fast, human minds might not be able to keep up. And therein lies the danger. You've already seen this movie. (Soundbite of movie, "Terminator 2: Judgment Day") Mr. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER (Actor): (as The Terminator) Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug. Ms. LINDA HAMILTON (Actress): (as Sarah Connor) Skynet fights back. Mr. SCHWARZENEGGER: (as The Terminator) Yes. KASTE: They kind of hate it at the institute when you quote the "Terminator," but Roedersheimer says, at least, those movies gave people a sense of what could happen. Mr. ROEDERSHEIMER: That's an A.I. that could get out of control. But if you really think about it, it's much worse than that. KASTE: Much worse than "Terminator"? Mr. ROEDERSHEIMER: Much, much worse.





The Singularity: Humanity's Last Invention?

S&P, Moody's Warn On U.S. Credit Rating

Mark Gongloff, Mark Brown, Nathan Boschat
Wall Street Journal

With attention focused on sovereign-debt worries in Europe, two major credit-rating firms reminded investors again that the U.S. has debt problems of its own.

Investors bought Treasury debt nonetheless, ignoring the comments, which echoed prior statements by the companies and may still be months or years away from having any practical meaning.

"The warning on the U.S. rating is well-founded," said Brian Yelvington, chief fixed-income strategist at Knight Capital. "However, it will probably fall on deaf ears until the peripheral Europe story plays out."

Moody's Investors Service said in a report on Thursday that the U.S. will need to reverse the expansion of its debt if it hopes to keep its "Aaa" rating.

Read Full Article

Canadian homeowner fined $5,200 for growing cucumbers

Citizens planning class-action suit over municipal grow-op inspections

photo: Les Bazso, PNG
Sam Cooper -- The Province

There’s no way Len Gratto is paying a $5,200 fine to Mission city hall for growing cucumbers in his basement.

Gratto — a 67-year-old who has lived for 30 years with his wife in their Mission home — says he’s raring to join an imminent class-action lawsuit attacking the municipality’s grow-op bylaw inspections.

A number of citizens, led by Mission man Stacy Gowanlock, will allege their homes were illegally searched for pot grow-ops and they were slapped with fees and repair orders costing upward of $10,000 — all on questionable evidence.

'TOGETHER WE THRIVE' SHOULD BE 'TOGETHER WE DIE'

By Dr. Laurie Roth
January 14, 2011
NewsWithViews.com

It just continues to get worse in Obama’s ‘syrupy’ manipulative way. His talk with folks in Arizona was nothing but a continued political campaign and war against conservatives. It was also an Obama worship shrine with bold emphasis on ‘togetherness’ and ‘consensus’ which is the new code speak for nothing but censorship!

In a time of tragedy where folks under normal conditions would benefit and desire inspirational and supportive words from their President, what did they get? T shirts placed on every seat saying “Together we Thrive.” That is nothing but a back handed insult and attack against the Tea Party folks and most of Americans these days that don’t want ‘together with him’ and what’s left of this radical administration’ anymore. The families of the victims and guests wanted to morn and honor the victims, not to be manipulated into another political rally for Obama and progressive leftists.

I heard a caller on talk radio call it perfectly when she said the push for consensus is really censorship. I couldn’t agree more. Now, the cuddly push for togetherness and unity is the classic, manipulative smoothness of most communist dictators, especially towards the beginning of total take overs. The idea is to get everyone on board to help the needy, the poor, the disenfranchised, the women, children and the elderly.

It is much easier to move the masses where you want, steal money and freedoms if people think in their hearts they are helping and doing the right thing for their country or ‘rock star’ leader. Once the manipulated folks start to get used to the smooth rhetoric, less money and freedom, like cattle they get used to being told what they will believe, what they will do and how they will spend what is left of their money. Is that what you want?

The people who refuse to be turned into cattle and pointed into the socialist/communist shoot are declared the enemy. Our voice and dissent are the promoted causes of racism, murders, acting out, anarchy, threats to our economy and way of life. It is the old…..find the enemy, patriotic thinkers who love and stand for freedom, demonize them, slander and lie about them, attack them in the media, financially, legally and then marginalize them.

The only problem this time is that vast majority of the American people get it, the Obama administration games and smear machine. We see the desire for total control over the people. We have seen over the last two years Obama and the progressive Democrats demonizing our returning Vets, pro lifers, gun owners, talk radio and Tea Party people, fiscal conservatives and those uncomfortable with Islamic radicals and communists.

This shooting in Arizona was a horrifying tragedy at the hands of a young man who fed his evil with the occult, drugs and the dark side. He didn’t listen to talk radio or news on TV. In fact he was an Independent and had trouble getting jobs and any dates. He was evil and sick.

‘Together we Thrive’ put on every T shirt on every chair in the listening audience is nothing but a manipulated push for censorship and a back door assault on any person or group who disagrees with the policies and behavior of this administration.

Keep it up Obama and the left. The American people are SO on to you and your smooth, togetherness tactics. We will boldly fight you until you are all out of office, looking for jobs and wondering what happened to your communistic plans. Bring it on.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Leftists Attack Parents Of Murdered 9-Year-Old

The dignity and class of the parents of Christina Taylor Green does not fit neatly into the partisan political script

Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
Monday, Jan 10th, 2011

Leftists Attack Parents Of Murdered 9 Year Old 100111ChristinaHow low will some people stoop to play at partisan politics by exploiting the weekend’s tragic events? We’ve already seen the bar set pretty damn low by elements of the media and some public officials, yet its hard to imagine how much further anyone can go than to verbally attack the parents of the slain 9 year old Christina Taylor Green.

Yet this is exactly what sometime AOL writer Jeanne Sager does in an article published today on parenting blog Cafemom.com.

“Seeing the couple on Dateline NBC last night, my first inclination was to grit my teeth and ask what kind of parent is ready to go on national TV 24 hours after the loss of their child?” writes Sager.

“The same type of parents who paraded their child out in a book about babies born on 9/11/01? They don’t deserve to be parents if they’re going to use horrors for their own gains.” she adds.

Exactly what “gains” are we talking about here Ms Sager? Their beloved child has just been shot dead. What in the world makes you believe they are gaining anything?

“…watching the Greens so exacting as they spoke of their daughter, so unfeeling. What, you couldn’t even summon a tear for your little girl? Everywhere I look, they’re talking to the media. To Fox News. To USA Today.” the disgusting slop continues.

Obviously Sager missed the entirety of John Green’s appearance on Fox News, in which he defiantly fought back the tears to convey the message that this awful but completely isolated and random event should not be exploited to revoke the core freedoms protected under the first and second amendments.

“We don’t need any more restrictions on our society,” Mr Green said, adding that sometimes our continued freedom comes at an awful cost.



While Sager stops her attack short and admits it is “completely unfair” and that she “feels sorry” for the family, it doesn’t prevent her from ending the piece with the question “Did you find yourself wondering why the Greens didn’t get off TV?”

The Greens are not fitting neatly into the script for those so called “liberals” that are happy to exploit the cold blooded murder of a child for political grist.

Presumably, Sager and her ilk would have no qualms with the TV appearances of the Greens should they have demanded the immediate passage of laws to make perceived threats a federal crime or to introduce hastily thrown together gun control bills.

These leftist vultures are the equivalent of the hordes of rightist neo-con hacks that professed hatred (yes, actual hatred) for the 9/11 victims’ families who opposed the subsequent relentless slaughter of thousands more innocent people half a world away in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The fact that their despicable smear machine has already ground to a halt in the wake of the revelation that gunman Jared Lee Loughner was a left-wing, pot-smoking liberal, rather than a flag waving tea party Sarah Palin supporter, is one blessing that the still sane can count.

Perhaps the only other is that in amongst a barrage of shameless partisan exploitation of another tragic event, Americans have been reminded that in the face of danger and darkness, there are still those who believe in preserving the values the nation was founded on, rather than tearing them apart.

62 School children see UFO land and alien beings come out



http://www.paranormalnewscentral.com visit for more information on Paranormal topics and news

One of the most interesting cases involving UFOs takes place in Ruwa, Zimbabwe. Ruwa is a small farming community in South Africa and news from the small town rarely gets out. On September 16, 1994, the children and teachers at Ariel School reported seeing a UFO that landed. This happened during recess time and the student's ages ranged from 5-12 years. 62 kids were outside the school during the incident with one adult supervising (sold food and drinks, mother of one of the kids).

What also makes this case interesting is reports of possible UFOs/meteors in the skies over Zimbabwe two days before the incident which the children were unaware of. The students at Ariel saw three UFOs in the skies disappear and reappear in different places with one of them landing. The UFO landed very close in a heavily wooded area which was off-limits to children. The students described a small human-like being on top of the craft who was 3 ft. (1 meter) tall, dark suit, slender neck, long black hair, large eyes and came towards the children. The being disappeared after he "watched" the children and took off in the craft. Many of the children were frightened by the little man and when they told the mother at the snack bar, she didn't believe them.

Cynthia Hind, Africa's top notch UFO researcher who is now deceased, investigated the incident. The children had 35 drawings and sketches waiting for her when she arrived which all depicted the extraterrestrial craft/being similarly. Colin Mackie, the school's headmaster, considered the children were truthful in what they saw. One of the students, a young girl, told Hind, "I swear by every hair on my head and the whole Bible that I am telling the truth." Dr. John Mack, along with researcher Dominique Callinmanopulos also investigated the case for 2 days interviewing 12 of the children and parents. Some of the older children said they were communicated with by the being (perhaps telepathically) that something may happen in the future, and humans were destroying the Earth. The Zimbabwe school sighting goes down as one of the best close encounter cases in history and a documentary is being made on the incident. Since the incident, news of the story has spread across the world, and its up to you whether you think 62 kids would make this up or not.

Is it Really "Fair Play" Between Us and the Elite?

Human World Order
Activist Post

Recently a "fixer" for the elite appeared anonymously as "Charles" in a compelling interview by Bill Ryan of Project Avalon. First, for those who study the real power structure on planet Earth, there's not much in the way of ground-breaking details. However, Charles' stern matter-of-fact answers add confirmation to many suspicions.

Charles confirms the elite's plans and motive for culling the population; a move to global currency with removal of financial borders; the very serious manner by which mega-food companies control all food; the incredible technology possessed by the ruling elite (including modular triangular UFOs); the fact that we should regard space more as an ocean with living creatures; and the idea of money and time as illusions.

He claims the reason he came forward was to give the public "fair" warning of things to come and let things play out as they may. According to Charles, the elite believe they are the responsible protectors of Corporation Earth and the human genome, which has become so bloated and broken that they need to "trim the fat off the surplus." The surplus of humans was created by the "machine itself," he says, and now they need to bring in a "liquidator" of sorts to downsize.

In the interview, he reveals that he believes, as his elite bosses believe, that the planet is broken and needs to be fixed. He likened it to being a father in a rushing river with his two sons, but he can save only one of them from drowning -- the stronger swimmer who can meet him halfway. This is also a metaphor for the elite's Darwinian approach to strengthening the human species.

He said that three plans are definitely on the table and already underway: 1) discredit and destroy the alternative media; 2) create massive famine by pulling the plug on food production and distribution; 3) execute a false flag UFO event to frighten the public into submitting to their leadership. In turn, he firmly stated that nuclear war is off the table, because it is not selective, ruins the environment, and is costly to rebuild afterward.

As evil as their methods appear to be, according to Charles there is a code of practice among the elite controllers to put the agenda out in the open -- however cryptic and hidden it may be. Their thinking is that this is a "fair" way to inform the earthlings who are smart enough to filter through the noise and find the truth. He claims that the average human simply "can't handle the truth."

Perhaps he's right that the masses can't yet handle the truth. Clearly, their plans and tactics for "culling the herd" can only be viewed as "evil" by the compassionate commoners who are just awakening. It is this anger, -- first about being lied to; and secondly by not having enough knowledge to remotely justify such drastic actions on the population -- which causes the newly awakened to instinctively want to fight the controllers.

However, it seems this venom and hatred toward the controllers is actually desired by them to feed the negativity and divisiveness. In other words, problems can't be solved by fighting them because it makes it easier for them to divide and conquer. Charles said the elite laugh at the alternative media infighting and misdirection, but when they get things right they will be targeted.

If it is true that the elite must engage in "fair play," it seems disingenuous to claim that fair warning is the same as fair play, especially when all hidden knowledge is buried by their controlled distractions and disinformation campaigns. Furthermore, hoarding all of the resources and technology, eons more advanced from the matrix of current civilization, is hardly allowing for the natural progression of humanity to exist in balance with the planet.

Given their absolute control of all the hidden knowledge, the material wealth, the war machine, the media, and super advanced technologies, it would appear that they are indestructible, or at least have an incredibly unfair advantage. However, Charles admits that humanity's resistance to mandatory vaccines during the engineered swine flu scare surprised them and forced them to retreat, displaying that overwhelming numbers still matter.

Incidentally, their rabid lust for power and control seems driven, at least in part, by fear and paranoia of losing everything. Surely they're aware that all it would take is a rapid shift in consciousness by the rabble to end their reign. It is unlikely the masses will be very forgiving given the scale of the lies. This, fellow humans, may be our biggest bargaining chip with the elite.

It is understandable that there are those who say we must destroy the evil elite to regain liberty. Yet, if we're being intellectually honest with ourselves, civilization has become delicately dependent on the elite's consolidated systems for food, energy, and water within the current matrix. Therefore, if the Human World Order topples the system in dramatic fashion, the human suffering will likely be far more severe and rapid than the elite's controlled implosion. This, by no means condones their deceptive and cruel tactics, just points out the obvious dilemma.

If the elite believe they have clear indications and statistics that planet earth and humanity as a whole is in crisis and needs adaptation, then the people should be entitled to the same wealth of information as the elite possess, so that such a profound decision can be made both by pragmatists, as well as idealists. After all, it is the unique ability of the human race to solve problems using both sides of our brain, which encompasses the entire spectrum from cold-hearted calculation to the soaring idealism of pure liberty and human compassion. Any decisions that are to be made about the future of our species may be best served through inclusion and cooperation, not solely by the elite.

Related Post on this Blog: Bill Ryan's commentary on the RULERS OF THE WORLD ...

Stave off Globalism: Reinvigorate Constitutional Principles

Michael Shaw, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

America was founded on certain principles: those of individual liberty and responsibility, a small federal government, and sovereign states that would protect their citizens’ unalienable rights. Over time many Americans got so involved in living their seemingly free lives they neglected oversight of what was happening to their country. Those who loved American ideals lived them and those who did not were busy working both from within and without the government to eradicate these principles from the American consciousness.

This dumbing down of America was planned and it took place over many decades as Charlotte Iserbyt explains in her Deliberate Dumbing Down of America expose. Controlled media and public education infused the populace with attitudes, values and beliefs that enabled the power thrust of globalists to grow. Thus the greatest political experiment in the history of the world has morphed into what we now call “globalism”.

Globalism is championed by the leaders of both political parties; the left uses environmentalism in pursuit of the globalist Wildlands Project and a substituted system of law called “social justice”. The right uses “public private partnerships” to reshape our economic system while advancing Smart Growth municipal planning. Between the globalist policies of the left and the right America teeters on the brink of destruction. Globalism is moving the entire world toward a system that regards human beings as livestock. This has been the unspoken center piece of American politics for many decades. Globalism has eaten away at the core principles that this country was founded on, especially the principles of the Declaration of Independence.

Today more and more ordinary people are starting to feel the effects. More people are losing their private property to the government and its’ partners. Logging and mining have been virtually stopped in the U.S., ostensibly because of environmental degradation. Family farming and ranching are on their way out, again because of environmental laws and the attacks on private interests. Even water rights are being denied and or stolen. City dwellers are experiencing increasing surveillance and controls.

The globalist-created fiat U.S. currency is ready to implode.

We know how we got into this situation; we forgot to stay alert and hew to the values of our predecessors. Now we must ask how these trends can be reversed. How can we rid the Unites States of globalism? This is what every American now faces because, finally, many people have awakened and are now ready to seek answers. After all, a movement of decent, concerned people might begin to recapture the promise of the American experiment.

What would such a movement focus upon? Here are some basics:

(1) The direct Constitutional limitations on the federal ownership of land would be followed. Article 1 Section 8 severely limits the federal government’s power over land. Federal lands including national parks, and federal forest land should be deeded to states. Some states would establish homestead distributions; others would carry on park activities. Any federal securitization of land or resources for international debt obligations would be negated.

(2) The US would withdraw from world governance organizations including the United Nations, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, and regional trade organizations like NAFTA and CAFTA. American control over American trade policy would be restored. Manufacturing would return to within our shores.

(3) Federal income tax and local property tax would be eliminated. The federal tax revenue would be based on Constitutional indirect taxation including import and excise taxes. (Article I Section 8 and Section 9) Government would be massively shrunk.

(4) A severe limitation would be placed on the presently exercised federal executive power to make any order. Further Executive Orders would be limited to the administration of executive duties. Executive Orders would no longer substitute for Congressional action.

(5) Information would be made available to the public, including the schools, regarding the fact that America was formed as a Republic where individual rights reign and where democratic action (mob rule) is limited.

(6) The nation would be rid of ICLEI, the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. ICLEI contracts with over 600 local communities for the purpose of implementing the U.N.’s Agenda 21 (The globalist Local Action Plan for the 21st century). Arguments are building that such contracts, executed by local elected officials, violate Article 1 Section 10 and that these actions are therefore treasonous. (ICLEI Primer: Your Town and Freedom Threatened)

(7) An honest and Constitutional system of money would be established. (Article 1 section 8.) This necessarily requires the elimination of the Federal Reserve and a new Constitutional system of money.

(8) American foreign policy would not seek global imperialism. Military actions would be required to receive Congressional approval via Declarations of War.

(9) The twentieth century saw a massive increase in the size and scope of the federal executive branch. These bureaucratic expansions have not improved America society. Accordingly, many federal departments and agencies need to be eliminated including: the Department of Education, The Department of Commerce, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Labor and the Department of Interior.

There is no need to reinvent the wheel. The Constitution was designed to protect freedom-loving people and rein in the powers of government. Do you have the spirit and the drive to help restore the American promise? If so, together we need to reinvigorate the principles that were designed to protect America from threats like modern globalism.

---------
Michael Shaw is a leading critic of the U.N.’s “Agenda 21”, which is the Action Plan implementing world government for the 21st Century. Shaw leads Freedom Advocates.org which is dedicated to providing news and information on what America stands for and how Agenda 21 is designed to transform America and the human experience.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

PROPOSED BILL BANS “UNCIVIL” CRITICISM OF POLITICIANS

www.truthtellers.org

By Rev. Ted Pike
12 Jan 11

Accused Arizona shooter Jared Loughner is clearly deranged. But Jewish attack groups and liberal Democrats are demanding laws that limit the "incivility" of the political right—which they claim motivated his violence.

Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), third-ranking Democrat in Congress, wants legislation enforcing balanced media coverage: reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine. This will require conservative media to simultaneously present the liberal point of view. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) is looking at legislative "ways to better police language on the airwaves."

Most threateningly, Rep. Robert Brady (D-PA) is crafting a bill which will give members of Congress special protection from criticism. Then it will be not just homosexuals and racial minorities with special rights and privileges, but also beleaguered Democrats.

Rep. Robert Brady, D-Pennsylvania, said he will introduce legislation making it a federal crime for a person to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a member of Congress or federal official... Brady is particularly incensed over a web posting by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin during the 2010 election in which she targeted 20 House Democrats, including Giffords, for political defeat. The posting showed a map of the United States in the 20 Democratic districts identified by cross-hairs... 'You can't put bulls-eyes or cross-hairs on a congressman or federal official...' Brady said... it is now time to put an end to the hyper-charged language. 'The rhetoric is just ramped up so negatively, so high, that we have got to shut this down,'... Brady noted that he wanted to have it ready as soon as possible. (CNN)

Whose perceptions will determine if a word or image might incite others to violence? Will it be ADL or its lackeys, such as US Attorney General Eric Holder? Or perhaps the FBI, working in close communication with such "thought police?"

Brady's legislation leads us into the mists of "thought crime" subjectivity. Such a national law would no longer uphold our First Amendment free speech rights but dedicate itself to avoidance of agitating the insane. Communicative tools of language and imagery with no serious suggestion of violence (such as Palin’s crosshairs) will become criminal. Use of an ever-longer list of forbidden words and images will become an offense against the state.

Scripture condemns those like Rep. Brady who “make a man an offender for a word.” (Isaiah 29:21) Christian civilized ethics judge us in general by the definable actions, legal or illegal, which accompany our words. Outlawing a list of politically incorrect words is medieval.

Under Brady’s bill, much of our free speech would be taken in order to keep the crazies calm. There are better, more proven ways society has found to deal with the insane. They include psychiatric drugs and mental hospitals, not federal speech crime laws that strip the majority of freedom.


Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

Jim Marrs & Alex Jones: Loughner, Just Another Brainwashed Assassin for The Establishment

TheAlexJonesChannel | January 09, 2011



On this Sunday edition, Alex covers the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and others in Tucson, Arizona, yesterday. Alex talks with former newspaper journalist and New York Times best-selling author Jim Marrs about the shooting. In Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy, Marrs writes about the CIA's mind-control guinea pigs and MK-ULTRA. Alex also covers other news and takes your calls.

Hollywood's Sabbatean Sex Propaganda




For more than 40 years, Illuminati Jews in Hollywood have trashed marriage and pounded the drum for sexual promiscuity.


by Henry Makow Ph.D,



In a fit of nostalgia, I watched one of my favorite movies again, "A Touch of Class" (1973). I had fond memories of a sophisticated romantic comedy starring George Segal and Glenda Jackson that had influenced me.

What a shock! I quickly realized why I was so messed up as a young man.
The movie presented a man betraying his wife and children as the height of sophistication and fun. It presented random sexual intercourse as if it were the Holy Grail. As an impressionable 23-year-old, I adopted these attitudes which ultimately undermined my ability to form healthy relationships with women. (I am now on my fourth and I hope final marriage.)

Then, I happened to see a trailer for an upcoming movie, "No Strings Attached" which teaches young people that promiscuous sex is the ultimate in modern thinking.

Both these movies were made by Jews. Although almost 40 years apart, Hollywood Jews are pumping out socially destructive agitprop in the guise of sophisticated comedy. If "A Touch of Class" hurt me, I can't imagine the damage Hollywood is now doing to the new generation.

Illuminati Jews Melvin Frank and Ivan Reitman directed the two movies respectively. Their sex for sex's sake dogma is hardly the "latest thing." The Illuminati are a continuation of the Sabbatean-Frankist Jewish heresy dating back to the 17th and 18th century.

The Sabbatean-Frankists were satanists who believed in "redemption through evil." The believed the Messiah would return when the world had descended into chaos. They advocated the destruction of marriage and family, and engaged in adultery, orgies, incest and pedophilia.

They have enormous power because the Rothschild banking syndicate belong to this cult. Sabbatean-Frankist (Illuminati) Jews were behind Communism and Zionism. Long story short, Satanism and Communism is spewing from our movie theaters and TV's, and no one has a clue.

Full article HERE

A Man Possessed?


Commentary & Analysis

by

L. A. Marzulli

When I first heard about the shooting in Arizona I began to ask, what are we looking at? Over last several days the stories have now emerged that Jared Loughner, the gunman, had a Satanic altar set up in his back yard. Before I get too much further into this BLOG, let me ask you something. Look at the picture to your left. Look into this guys eyes. The eyes are the windows to the soul. Who do you think you’re looking at?

I recognize those eyes and so does my friend and colleague, Russ Dizdar. I spoke to Russ last might on the phone and we discussed the shooting. Both of us agreed that this guy was most likely a programmed assassin that was switched on to create as much mayhem as possible. We also believe that he was instructed to kill himself, but his rampage was cut short when he was tackled and thrown to the ground.

We need to realize that Loughner had extra ammo clips with him so that if he hadn’t been stopped, he would have reloaded and killed as many people as possible before turning the gun on himself. Here’s the question, is this guy a super soldier? Was he programmed to kill? If so, who switched him on and for what purpose?

I don’t have the answers to this, but Russ and I agreed that this guy wasn’t crazy, he was deliberate and acted in a trained way. He was focused, calm, and deadly.

While the main stream media won’t touch this paradigm, Russ and I do. Yesterday we learned that Loughner had a make-shift satanic altar in his back yard. When I viewed it, I wasn’t impressed with it. It looked like a prop to me.

In closing today’s post, like the video I posted a while back, Madness in the Fast Lane. We are not sure what we are looking at here. To me, just looking at the photo is a dead give-a-way. The guy looks possessed.

Russ Dizdar believes as I do that these satanic super soldiers are programmed to cause as much chaos as possible. The roots of this goes back to WWII and Nazi Germany. MK Ultra is taken from the German, Mind Kontrol. We know that our CIA used this to try to create the perfect assassin. Below is the video that was taken at the Congressional hearings about Mind Control. You will notice that this woman was trained in Arizona…. God Help us! It’s real folks….

CIA Mind Control Operation MK-ULTRA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXDASDDrDkM

US inmate executed with animal drug

Wed Jan 12, 2011
Jeffery Matthews is the second person to have been killed by a drug typically used to put down animals in the US state of Oklahoma in 2011.
In the United States a death row inmate whose execution was postponed three times has finally been put to death with a drug normally used to euthanize animals.


Jeffrey Matthews was convicted of murdering a 77-year-old man named Otis Earl Short in a 1995 burglary.

During his time in prison, the 38-year-old had continuously fought for his freedom, claiming that he had no part in the crime.

His support committee had also unraveled documents referring to various points of evidence that is believed to support Matthews' claims of innocence.

They argued that no fingerprints, hair, nor DNA were found at the crime scene and that not even the wife of the victim saw Matthews face.

However, despite the lack of proper evidence, Matthews was put to death at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary.

In his final statement, Matthews told his family he was enjoying his last moments.

Matthews is the second person to have been killed using the sedative pentobarbital in the US state of Oklahoma this year.

On Thursday, Billy Dawn Alverson was executed for the killing of a convenience store worker in 1995.

A shortage of sodium thiopental -- an anesthetic usually used to make death row inmates unconscious just before their execution -- has forced Oklahoma to use pentobarbital.

Experts argue that the use of the new sedative, which is typically used to put down animals, is inhumane since inmates could be conscious but paralyzed when the other drugs were administered.

There are 3,261 death row inmates in the United States, as of January 2010, according to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, a leading US civil rights organization.

FF/HRF
Related Stories:

Cleanup worker suffering from large boils, multiple skin infections (DISTURBING PHOTOS)

Florida Oil Spill Law

Interview with cleanup worker Jennifer Rexford, Florida Oil Spill Law, January 11, 2011:

Jennifer Rexford


Jennifer Rexford worked on beach cleanup in the Florida panhandle for BP contractor P2S until August 2010.

During an interview with floridaoilspilllaw.com, Rexford revealed that she is suffering from:

  • Multiple skin infections
  • Large boils
  • Memory problems

Currently, she is gathering information on the condition of other cleanup workers and possible OSHA violations committed by BP and their contractors.

The cleanup workers she is in contact with are suffering from:

  • Stomach problems
  • Lumps in their breast
  • Respiratory problems
  • Kidney problems
  • Skin infections

Photos taken by Rexford on January 3, 2011:

Source: Jennifer Rexford

Source: Jennifer Rexford

Source: Jennifer Rexford

Source: Jennifer Rexford

More to come…

WikiLeaks chief: Charge Palin, Huckabee with ‘incitements to kill’

Sahil Kapur
Raw Story
Jan 11, 2011

The editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks called on US authorities to seek charges against high-profile Republicans Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee for “incitements to kill” by the use of “violent rhetoric” against the anti- secrecy outlet.

Julian Assange’s plea came in a press release Monday night in the aftermath of the Tucson murders Saturday that left 6 dead and 14 others wounded, the victims of which included Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) and federal judge John Roll.

“No organisation anywhere in the world is a more devoted advocate of free speech than WikiLeaks but when senior politicians and attention seeking media commentators call for specific individuals or groups of people to be killed they should be charged with incitement — to murder,” Assange said, mentioning comments made by, among others, Palin and Huckabee, two likely contenders for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012.

In recent months, as WikiLeaks has engaged in the unauthorized leaks of embarrassing state secrets about the US and other countries, Huckabee has called for the “execution” of Assange, while Palin has urged authorities to pursue him “with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders.”

Full article here

"Loose Change" - Next Scapegoat in Arizona Shooting?

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
January 11, 2011

It looks like Democrats and liberals now have a new target in their war against political speech in the wake of the shooting in Arizona – the 9/11 truth movement and the documentary Loose Change.

During an AP interview with the father of a high school friend of Jared Lee Loughner, we learn that the accused mass murderer watched Loose Change, the 9/11 documentary directed by Dylan Avery and produced by Jason Bermas and Korey Rove.



Alex Jones is an executive producer of the film. Millions of people have watched the film on the internet and it was deemed an internet blockbuster by Vanity Fair in 2006. The documentary was criticized and “debunked” by the State Department and Popular Mechanics.

Loughner, according to George Osler, also took Salvia divinorum, a psychoactive plant which can induce dissociative effects and is described as a potent producer of “visions” and other hallucinatory experiences.

In the next few days, we can expect the corporate media to claim the mental case Loughner was a 9/11 truther.

The tragic shooting has resulted in calls for censorship. Democrat Rep. Jim Clyburn has called for the so-called Fairness Doctrine to be imposed by the government on talk radio. Media Matters CEO David Brock asked Rupert Murdoch to rein in or possibly even fire Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, according to Politico.

Talk radio appears to be the primary target. MSNBC liberal attack dog Chris Matthews went after to popular talk radio personalities in the wake of the attack – Mark Levin and Michael Savage.

Sheeple



The Black Sheep tries to warn its friends with the truth it has seen, unfortunately herd mentality kicks in for the Sheeple, and they run in fear from the black sheep and keep to the safety of their flock.

Having tried to no avail to awaken his peers, the Black Sheep have no other choice but to unite with each other and escape the impending doom.

What color Sheep are you?

.





100627