By
Darren Weeks
March 8, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
March 8, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
Mayoral
resolution approved by council gives power to military
Martial
Law is defined
by Random House dictionary as:
1. the law temporarily imposed upon an area by state or national military forces when civil authority has broken down or during wartime military operations.2. the law imposed upon a defeated country or occupied territory by the military forces of the occupying power.
In my
last article, I explored the Martial Law declaration that was issued
in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy and its devastation. I made the statement
that I believe we are beginning to see the unfolding of a new norm. A
trend seems to be evolving where local, state, or regional officials are
using states of emergency or outright Martial Law declarations to deal
with small-scale problems.
Since
that time, we have seen three states — Connecticut, Rhode Island
and Massachusetts — all issue emergency declarations, restricting
travel, due to an anticipated snowstorm. One might ask how could it be
that northern states might be so ill-prepared for a major snowstorm so
as to warrant the suspension of thousands of individuals’ right
to travel? Imagine... snow in the north! In the winter! Who would have
thunk it?
Massachusetts
Governor Deval Patrick issued an executive
order on February 8th, banning all civilian travel with certain very
specific exceptions — mainly emergency services, the media, and
those contributing to critical infrastructure and resources. Numerous
media sources reported that violation of the Deval’s order would
carry with it a potential $1,000
fine and up to a year in jail! What if your wife was pregnant and
you needed to get her to the hospital? Guess you’re out of luck,
huh? What if you have some other emergency? Too bad for you! Your exception
to the rule wasn’t mentioned in Dictator Deval’s order.
Aside
from the fact that there are countless legitimate reasons for people to
be on the roadways during a major snowstorm — many of which couldn’t
possibly be foreseen by an executive decree — this “Deval”
governor has no business restricting the people’s right to travel.
Yet, that is exactly what he did, which is completely unnecessary and
should be considered unacceptable to the populace. He should be immediately
recalled, and state legislative guidelines should be put into place, making
it a criminal offense to use executive orders for purposes such as this.
Encouraging people to stay off the roads is fine. Mandating it under threat
of massive fines and imprisonment? Not in a free society.
On the
heels of that outrage, we now learn that on February 20th, Tucson, Arizona
Mayor Jonathan
Rothschild — yes, that’s really his name — issued
Resolution
#22006 (pdf) which declares a state of emergency in the city of Tucson.
Section
1 “recognizes” the leadership of the Davis-Monthan Air Force
Base “to make the appropriate decisions when balancing National
Security and community needs when it comes to their existing and future
military mission and assignments.”
What
“future military mission and assignments” might warrant the
need for the military to make decisions and address community needs? What
“National Security” crisis could be foreseen as to warrant
a military base to operate independently of duly-elected government representatives?
The resolution doesn’t say.
Section
2 specifies, “The various city officers are authorized and directed
to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this Resolution.”
Presumably,
this would mean that all city officers, including the local police chief
and city police officers would now be under the ultimate authority of
the military, who in turn answer to the commander-in-chief of the armed
forces — the Oval Office usurper.
The
Resolution further states in Section 3: “WHEREAS, it is necessary
for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Tucson
that this Resolution become immediately effective, an emergency is hereby
declared to exist and this Resolution shall be effective immediately upon
its passage and adoption.” It then states that it was adopted by
the mayor and council on February 20, 2013.
Prior
to writing this article, this writer telephoned the Tucson mayor’s
office to seek comment for this story. A lady answered the phone who said
her name was Kimberly. When I questioned her about the purpose and intent
of the resolution, she stated that she was “not at liberty to discuss”
the matter.
Further
pressing her on the fact that the resolution actually declares a state
of emergency for the city of Tucson, I inquired as to what the nature
of the emergency was that would warrant such a declaration. She indicated
that there was no real emergency and that she “had been told”
that the language was “standard language” used in all of their
resolutions.
I then
asked, “you mean every time the mayor signs a resolution, he declares
a state of emergency?”
She
then replied, “no” and proceeded to offer to take my name
and contact information down, so that her communications director could
call me back to explain.
As we
send this article to be published, we are still awaiting that call.
No comments:
Post a Comment