Almost EVERYTHING we have been told (and are still being told) are lies . . . the sooner that humanity admits that it has been duped, the sooner something gets done about it . . .
Ken
O'Keefe discusses "who is ISIS" and the absurdity of what the
mainstream media is telling us in this latest false flag manipulation
brought to you by the powers that be.
this is excellent PROOF that the title of this post is correct . . please refer to the links provided here at the top of the article when there is a subject brought up that you would like to see for yourself, as the "original" source link seems to have been removed from the internet. . . if you will take the time to read and think, I hope that you will agree that we have been lied to about some of the most important things that we were taught to "believe" about our country (the U.S.), but that it has been done with the truth being an open secret . . . I wonder, do ALL of the politicians know this? It doesn't matter, if they do not, then they are imbeciles, if they do, they are part of the lie . . theforbiddenknowledge.com
THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A
BRITISH COLONY
EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
A DOCUMENTARY REVIEW OF
CHARTERS AND TREATIES
August 17, 1996
An Expose'
An introduction by the
"Informer"
This is the latest from a
man who visits me quite often. He and another man researched my theory
that we have never been free from the British Crown. This disc shows the
results. I have states that we will never win in their courts. This
shows conclusively why. We have the hard copy of the treaties that are
the footnotes. This predates Schroder's material, my research of the
1861 stats by Lincoln that put us under the War Powers confiscation
acts, and John Nelson's material. All our material supports that the
real Principal, the King of England, still rules this country through
the bankers and why we own no property in allodium. This is why it is so
important to start OUR courts of God's natural (common) Law and break
away from all the crap they have handed us. This is one reason Virginia
had a law to hang all lawyers but was somehow, by someone, (the King)
set aside to let them operate again. Some good people put in the
original 13th amendment so that without the lawyers the King could not
continue his strangle hold on us. James shows how that was quashed by
the King. I am happy that James' research of six months bears out my
theory, that most people would not listen to me, that we are still
citizen/subjects under the kings of England. My article called
"Reality" published in the American Bulletin and the article
of mine on the "Atocha case," wherein Florida in 1981 used
it's sovereignty under the British crown to try to take away the gold
from the wreck found in Florida waters supports this premise. James
makes mention of the Law dictionaries being England's Law Dict. you will
not is lists the reign of all the Kings of England. It never mentions
the reign of the Presidents of this country. Ever wonder Why? Get this
out to as many people as you can.
The trouble with history is, we weren't
there when it took place and it can be changed to fit someone's belief
and/or traditions, or it can be taught in the public schools to favor a
political agenda, and withhold many facts. I know you have been taught
that we won the Revolutionary War and defeated the British, but I can
prove to the contrary. I want you to read this paper with an open mind,
and allow yourself to be instructed with the following verifiable facts.
You be the judge and don't let prior conclusions on your part or incorrect
teaching, keep you from the truth. I too was always taught in school and in
studying our history books that our freedom came from the Declaration of
Independence and was secured by our winning the Revolutionary War. I'm
going to discuss a few documents that are included at the end of this
paper, in the footnotes. The first document is the first Charter of
Virginia in 1606 (footnote #1). In the first paragraph, the king of
England granted our fore fathers license to settle and colonize America.
The definition for license is as follows. "In Government Regulation. Authority
to do some act or carry on some trade or business, in its nature lawful
but prohibited by statute, except with the permission of the civil
authority or which would otherwise be unlawful." Bouvier's Law
Dictionary, 1914. Keep in mind those that came to America
from England were British subjects. So you can better understand what I'm
going to tell you, here are the definitions for subject and citizen. "In monarchical governments, by
subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch."
Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914. "Constitutional Law. One that owes
allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws. The natives of
Great Britain are subjects of the British government. Men in free
governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy
rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The
term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican
form of government." Swiss Nat. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 267 U.S. 42, 45
S. Ct. 213, 214, 69 L.Ed. 504. Blacks fifth Ed. I chose to give the definition for
subject first, so you could better understand what definition of citizen
is really being used in American law. Below is the definition of citizen
from Roman law. "The term citizen was used in Rome
to indicate the possession of private civil rights, including those
accruing under the Roman family and inheritance law and the Roman contract
and property law. All other subjects were peregrines. But in the beginning
of the 3d century the distinction was abolished and all subjects were
citizens; 1 sel. Essays in Anglo-Amer. L. H. 578." Bouvier's Law
Dictionary, 1914. The king was making a commercial venture
when he sent his subjects to America, and used his money and resources to
do so. I think you would admit the king had a lawful right to receive gain
and prosper from his venture. In the Virginia Charter he declares his
sovereignty over the land and his subjects and in paragraph 9 he declares
the amount of gold, silver and copper he is to receive if any is found by
his subjects. There could have just as easily been none, or his subjects
could have been killed by the Indians. This is why this was a valid right
of the king (Jure Coronae, "In right of the crown," Black's
forth Ed.), the king expended his resources with the risk of total loss. If you'll notice in paragraph 9 the king
declares that all his heirs and successors were to also receive the same
amount of gold, silver and copper that he claimed with this Charter. The
gold that remained in the colonies was also the kings. He provided the
remainder as a benefit for his subjects, which amounted to further use of
his capital. You will see in this paper that not only is this valid, but
it is still in effect today. If you will read the rest of the Virginia
Charter you will see that the king declared the right and exercised the
power to regulate every aspect of commerce in his new colony. A license
had to be granted for travel connected with transfer of goods (commerce)
right down to the furniture they sat on. A great deal of the king's
declared property was ceded to America in the Treaty of 1783. I want you
to stay focused on the money and the commerce which was not ceded to
America. This brings us to the Declaration of
Independence. Our freedom was declared because the king did not fulfill
his end of the covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was
taxation without representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606
Charter granted by the king. It was not a revolt over being subject to the
king of England, most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the
king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief,
separation from England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of freedom
and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The
slogan "Don't Tread On Me" was the standard borne by the
militias. The Revolutionary War was fought and
concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As
Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our
freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will
totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War. (footnote 2). I want you to notice in the first
paragraph that the king refers to himself as prince of the Holy Roman
Empire and of the United States. You know from this that the United States
did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and
victory, but it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams
negotiated a Treaty of further granted privileges from the king of
England. Keep this in mind as you study these documents. You also need to
understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty. For the
Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard
bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire.
An Esquire in the above usage was a
granted rank and Title of nobility by the king, which is below Knight and
above a yeoman, common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do manual
labor as signified by this status, see the below definitions.
"Esquires by virtue of their
offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust
under the crown....for whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who
studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who
can live idly, and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge,
and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be called master, and shall be
taken for a gentleman." Blackstone Commentaries p. 561-562
"Esquire - In English Law. A title
of dignity next above gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office
given to sheriffs, serjeants, and barristers at law, justices of the
peace, and others." Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641
Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John
Jay as you can read in the Treaty were all Esquires and were the signers
of this Treaty and the only negotiators of the Treaty. The representative
of the king was David Hartley Esqr..
Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator
for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between
England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others British
subjection and loyalty to the crown.
In the first article of the Treaty most
of the kings claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to
continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business
venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the
United States and its rivers. In article 4 the United States agreed to pay
all bona fide debts. If you will read my other papers on money you will
understand that the financiers were working with the king. Why else would
he protect their interest with this Treaty?
I wonder if you have seen the main and
obvious point? This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781.
If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to
America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him
in the Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans
sign such a Treaty, when they knew that this would void any sovereignty
gained by the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we
had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our land would not be
necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War.
To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after
winning a war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have
won, such as when we defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate
to him the terms for surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status
and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection of future
unaware generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their
lives and property for the chance to be free.
When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington
he surrendered the battle, not the war. Read the Article of Capitulation
signed by Cornwallis at Yorktown (footnote 3)
Jonathan Williams recorded in his book,
Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his
surrender that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is
ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions
will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown."...."in less
than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world
government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the
British Empire."
All the Treaty did was remove the United
States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship
material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time
he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which
is still being created today; millions of dollars a day. And his heirs and
successors are still reaping the benefit of the kings original venture. If
you will read the following quote from Title 26, you will see just one
situation where the king is still collecting a tax from those that receive
a benefit from him, on property which is purchased with the money the king
supplies, at almost the same percentage:
-CITE- 26 USC Sec. 1491
HEAD- Sec. 1491. Imposition of tax
-STATUTE- There is hereby imposed on the transfer
of property by a citizen or resident of the United States, or by a
domestic corporation or partnership, or by an estate or trust which is not
a foreign estate or trust, to a foreign corporation as paid-in surplus or
as a contribution to capital, or to a foreign estate or trust, or to a
foreign partnership, an excise tax equal to 35 percent of the excess of - (1) the fair market value of the property
so transferred, over (2) the sum of - (A) the adjusted basis (for determining
gain) of such property in the hands of the transferor, plus (B) the amount of the gain recognized to
the transferor at the time of the transfer.
-SOURCE- (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 365;
Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94-455, title X, Sec. 1015(a), 90 Stat. 1617; Nov.
6, 1978, Pub. L. 95-600, title VII, Sec. 701(u)(14)(A), 92 Stat. 2919.)
-MISC1- AMENDMENTS 1978 - Pub. L. 95-600 substituted 'estate
or trust' for 'trust' wherever appearing. 1976 - Pub. L. 94-455 substituted in
provisions preceding par. (1) 'property' for 'stocks and
securities' and '35 percent' for '27 1/2 percent' and in par. (1) 'fair market value' for 'value' and
'property' for 'stocks and securities' and in par. (2) designated existing provisions as
subpar. (A) and added subpar. (B). EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT Section 701(u)(14)(C) of Pub. L. 95-600
provided that: 'The amendments made by this paragraph (amending this
section and section 1492 of this title) shall apply to transfers after
October 2, 1975.' EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1976 AMENDMENT Section 1015(d) of Pub. L. 94-455
provided that: 'The amendments made by this section (enacting section 1057
of this title, amending this section and section 1492 of this title, and
renumbering former section 1057 as 1058 of this title) shall apply to
transfers of property after October 2, 1975.'
A new war was declared when the Treaty
was signed. The king wanted his land back and he knew he would be able to
regain his property for his heirs with the help of his world financiers.
Here is a quote from the king speaking to Parliament after the
Revolutionary War had concluded.
(Six weeks after) the capitulation of
Yorktown, the king of Great Britain, in his speech to Parliament (Nov. 27,
1781), declared "That he should not answer the trust committed to the
sovereign of a free people, if he consented to sacrifice either to his own
desire of peace, or to their temporary ease and relief, those essential
rights and permanent interests, upon the maintenance and preservation of
which the future strength and security of the country must forever
depend." The determined language of this speech, pointing to the
continuance of the American war, was echoed back by a majority of both
Lords and Commons. In a few days after (Dec. 12), it was
moved in the House of Commons that a resolution should be adopted
declaring it to be their opinion "That all farther attempts to reduce
the Americans to obedience by force would be ineffectual, and injurious to
the true interests of Great Britain." The rest of the debate can be
found in (footnote 4). What were the true interests of the king? The gold,
silver and copper.
The new war was to be fought without
Americans being aware that a war was even being waged, it was to be fought
by subterfuge and key personnel being placed in key positions. The first
two parts of "A Country Defeated In Victory," go into detail
about how this was done and exposes some of the main players.
Every time you pay a tax you are
transferring your labor to the king, and his heirs and successors are
still receiving interest from the original American Charters.
The following is the definition of
tribute (tax). "A contribution which is raised by a
prince or sovereign from his subjects to sustain the expenses of the
state. A sum of money paid by an inferior sovereign or state to a superior
potentate, to secure the friendship or protection of the latter."
Blacks Law Dictionary forth ed. p. 1677
As further evidence, not that any is
needed, a percentage of taxes that are paid are to enrich the king/queen
of England. For those that study Title 26 you will recognize IMF, which
means Individual Master File, all tax payers have one. To read one you
have to be able to break their codes using file 6209, which is about 467
pages. On your IMF you will find a blocking series, which tells you what
type of tax you are paying. You will probably find a 300-399 blocking
series, which 6209 says is reserved. You then look up the BMF 300-399,
which is the Business Master File in 6209. You would have seen prior to
1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is
considered a business and involved in commerce and you are being held
liable for a tax via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to
the U.K.. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288,
FIRPTA - Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won't find many
people using this form, just the 1040 form. The 8288 form can be found in
the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you will check the
OMB's paper - Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of
Treasury, List of Active Information Collections, Approved Under Paperwork
Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545-0902, which
says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of
U.S. real property interests-statement of withholding on dispositions, by
foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a. These codes have since been
changed to read as follows; IMF 300-309, Barred Assement, CP 55 generated
valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reserved,
the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K.
Tax Treaty Claims. The long and short of it is nothing changed, the
government just made it plainer, the 1040 is the payment of a foreign tax
to the king/queen of England. We have been in financial servitude since
the Treaty of 1783.
Another Treaty between England and the
United States was Jay's Treaty of 1794 (footnote 5). If you will remember
from the Paris Treaty of 1783, John Jay Esqr. was one of the negotiators
of the Treaty. In 1794 he negotiated another Treaty with Britain. There
was great controversy among the American people about this Treaty.
In Article 2 you will see the king is
still on land that was supposed to be ceded to the United States at the
Paris Treaty. This is 13 years after America supposedly won the
Revolutionary War. I guess someone forgot to tell the king of England. In
Article 6, the king is still dictating terms to the United States
concerning the collection of debt and damages, the British government and
World Bankers claimed we owe. In Article 12 we find the king dictating
terms again, this time concerning where and with who the United States
could trade. In Article 18 the United States agrees to a wide variety of
material that would be subject to confiscation if Britain found said
material going to its enemies ports. Who won the Revolutionary War?
That's right, we were conned by some of
our early fore fathers into believing that we are free and sovereign
people, when in fact we had the same status as before the Revolutionary
War. I say had, because our status is far worse now than then. I'll
explain.
Early on in our history the king was
satisfied with the interest made by the Bank of the United States. But
when the Bank Charter was canceled in 1811 it was time to gain control of
the government, in order to shape government policy and public policy.
Have you never asked yourself why the British, after burning the White
House and all our early records during the War of 1812, left and did not
take over the government. The reason they did, was to remove the greatest
barrier to their plans for this country. That barrier was the newly
adopted 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose for
this Amendment was to stop anyone from serving in the government who was
receiving a Title of nobility or honor. It was and is obvious that these
government employees would be loyal to the granter of the Title of
nobility or honor. The War of 1812 served several purposes.
It delayed the passage of the 13th Amendment by Virginia, allowed the
British to destroy the evidence of the first 12 states ratification of
this Amendment, and it increased the national debt, which would coerce the
Congress to reestablish the Bank Charter in 1816 after the Treaty of Ghent
was ratified by the Senate in 1815. [continue reading at the links below]
In my recent article, Suppressed Pedophilia Allegations Reveal Culture of Satanic Ritual Abuse,
I discussed the story of the Hampstead child-abuse whistleblowers, 9
year old Hampstead girl Alisa and her 8 year old brother Gabriel, whose
testimony of alleged abuse at the hands of their father, Ricky Dearman,
and a satanic cult had just been leaked into alternative media. The
alleged abuses involve a network of pedophiles in positions of public
trust, including school teachers (from 8 different schools), priests,
social workers, health care workers, child protection agencies and
police officers, and medical examination of the children revealed
physical trauma consistent with long-term sexual abuse.
However, adding to the complexity of this situation, the more evidence that comes to light surrounding the modus operandi
of child molestation and trafficking networks, the more it appears that
those people at the top of our society’s most influential social and
legal are actively working to protect organized pedophilia and
child-trafficking networks, rather than to dismantle them and bring the
perpetrators to justice. So while Ricky Dearman has since been cleared
of wrong-doing by the High Court in the UK, unanswered questions remain
as to whether justice has indeed been served in this case.
The Hampstead Case
Following the initial allegations, the
children were examined by a Police Medical Officer. Medical reports
cited physical injuries consistent with blunt force trauma that
correlated with allegations of physical and sexual abuse. The children
gave names and also provided details of perpetrators’ anatomies,
characteristics and birth marks etc. However the UK legal establishment
failed to begin formal investigations into these allegations, instead
appearing to close ranks around the individuals and institutions
implicated. Only after the children’s recorded confessions were made
public did authorities pursue legal action — against the children’s
mother, Ella Draper.
Showing little sensitivity to the nature
of these allegations, the children were taken from Draper’s custody by
UK authorities and entrusted to a network of social workers, health care
workers, child protection agencies and police — part of the same
institutional networks that the children alleged to have been involved
in facilitating their abuse.
According to Ms. Draper, the children
were later asked by Police to retract their statements in police
interviews conducted after the children had already spent 6 days in two
separate foster care accommodations. Notably, the children’s initial
statements correlated with each other while also being extremely
detailed, however their later retractions (issued after almost a week in
institutional placement) were entirely dissimilar.
Perceiving there to be holes in the
official narrative of this case, many citizens and activists around the
world have been mobilized and, since February, much more research has
been done by those whose priority is to defend the rights of these
children — and indeed, children everywhere — from the potential of
systemic, self-protecting abuse networks. Their efforts have helped to
create a bigger-picture understanding of this complex situation, lifting
the veil on the organized and institutionalized molestation, abduction,
trafficking, sale, rape, torture and murder of children involving
governments, media, churches and charities.
With unanswered questions mounting,
activists working to uncover the truth of this situation have become
increasingly disconcerted by the apparent inaction of high-level
authorities in this and countless other matters of child abuse. Volumes
of recent and historical evidence indicates that global pedophilia and
child-trafficking networks are not only operating within the ranks of
our society’s most influential governing bodies and institutions, but
are also being protected from legal recourse by those same institutions.
Implicated by this evidence are countless well-known politicians and
officials, educators, entertainers, media heads, and public and
religious figures, many of whom are claimed to enjoy the calculated
protections of conspirators within the political, media, religious and
justice systems — the systems that are meant to protect our children’s
interests, not their abusers.
Let’s examine the evidence.
Pedophiles in Politics
Allegations of pedophilia and satanic
ritual abuse, child stealing and child trafficking are dangerously
common amongst the highest ranking members of our society. The
recurrence and consistence of allegations involving the powerful elite
at the highest levels, coupled with the demonstrably routine suppression
of evidence relating to those allegations, raises some difficult yet
critical questions. Have the institutions we trust to serve the public’s
best interests (including government, technology and media giants) in
fact become corrupted, systemically serving more sinister, undisclosed
ends?
As you’ll see in the short video
below, British MP John Mann delivered a passionate speech to the
British Parliament on 23th May 2015, outlining just how extensively
pedophilia, child abuse and slavery networks are within the British
Government.
There are already over 1,400 suspects
involved in just one alleged British pedophile ring alone, with many
more cases coming to light in Australia following recent investigations
of the Royal Commission Into Child Abuse into the activity of the
nation’s institutional bodies.
According to Mann:
“My
constituency is no worse, no different to anywhere else in the country.
This is nationwide, it’s every aspect of society… I’m expecting other
people with other names coming forward from other parts of the country
in the near future, others have already done so.
“The
scandal of historic child abuse in this country is going to be one of
the defining issues of the next five years… It is going to corrode
everything over this Parliament because it is so large, it is so huge,
it involves so many people… and this Parliament is going to have to deal
with it.”
Getting Up to Speed…
The following broadcast from the The Kev Baker Show on Truth Frequency Radio features a 2 hour interview with researcher, author and broadcaster Chris Everard
who presents a detailed and up-to-date report of the situation in the
UK. If you don’t have the time to view all the links connected to this
article, this one is the one to watch.
As shocking as the notion of pedophilia
is, the information that actually reaches mainstream media and therefore
the common perception of what pedophilia actually is – what it involves, and who – barely scratches the surface of the reality.
Our society is controlled by a Satanic ruling class.
They are criminals, hiding behind the ‘respectable’ upper hierarchies
of our society. It is difficult to believe such atrocities are occurring
in the ‘civilized’ West in the 21st Century, but the evidence has
become so overwhelming that we can no longer claim ignorance. We (myself
included) have no choice but to put our fears aside and find the
courage to seriously examine this cesspit of humanity, and to act on
what we find. Ongoing investigations are uncovering unimaginable
atrocities and, heart-broken, many of us would rather not pursue the
truth any further. It can seem like too much to bear, so we would often
rather dismiss it because we cannot endure nor comprehend it, much less
believe we can do something about it. Too often, our spontaneous
response is one of cognitive dissonance.
Ultimately, the truth cannot be ignored.
Our conscience must not let us ignore the facts. This horror is all
very real. It is very calculated, and it is happening globally. Innocent
children are being raped and murdered on a daily basis, victims of
organized abduction and satanic ritual. With so many identical cases
worldwide, all avenues of research constantly and consistently lead to
the same conclusion. This goes way beyond our common comprehension of
child abuse and pedophilia: the culture of ritual abuse is so heavily
embedded in our most influential institutions and ‘protective’ agencies,
that information is routinely suppressed and censored, protecting their
networks, themselves and each other — the perpetrators.
(For example, the videos and research
links embedded in my previous article had to be constantly replaced and
updated, as they were routinely removed from circulation by supposedly
impartial technology providers. This is still a work in progress… )
In my research, I recently came across
a 5 part video series that provides similar details of satanic pedophile
rings allegedly operating in France and Germany. Outlining a series
of horrors endured and witnessed at the hands of satanic cultists, the
children speaking here claim to have been subjected to and
witnessed acts of slavery, rape, murder, torture, trafficking, as well
as rituals involving masks and costumes, injections, underground tunnel
systems, blood drinking, cannibalism, and ‘snuff movies’ — films of
abuse victims’ deaths, which are said to sell for up to $20,000 Euros a
piece.
Further Evidence of Institutional Abuse
There is extensive evidence that human baby and fetus trafficking networks extend into Central America and Asia, reportedly for the purposes of ‘black magic’ ritual. In one case in China reported in January,
authorities rescued 37 babies and a toddler from an abandoned factory
in the southwestern province of Shandong. The children were in poor
physical condition and many were suffering from HIV/AIDS and
malnutrition. Human traffickers were found to be recruiting pregnant
women to sell their babies and hiding them in the factory until they
gave birth. Once the women gave birth, they handed their newborns over
to the traffickers and left. The babies were then drugged and smuggled
inside handbags and luggage to a hospital morgue where they were kept
until buyers arrived.
Another recent case uncovered a “baby
making factory” in Nigeria, where young girls were used to
“breed” babies, which are then taken and sold on the black market to
traffickers for supply to networks of Satanic ritualists and pedophiles.
According to reports, an unsuspecting women’s and children’s hospital
provides the cover of a humanitarian outfit for the inhumane trade and
sale of babies and children. This shocking 4 minute video leaves us with no doubt this crime against humanity is all too real, and by no means restricted to Nigeria alone.
Notably, this kind of cover operation
is also in keeping with Satanic principles. In Satanism, war is peace,
restriction is freedom, black is white. This is how they operate. Posing
as the protectors of children simultaneously enables their access to
victims and provides them a cover of respectability.
An extensive report
containing an interview with a former undercover Interpol agent
(Bannon) further reveals just how trafficking networks are set up.
Bannon puts those who sexually exploit children into two categories:
consumer-traders and producers:
“The
consumer-trader is the guy or woman you’ve heard about – maybe the local
teacher – who’s abusing children and buying images and selling images
of those abuses online… The producer is the one who actually buys and
sells the children across international lines, running a
multi-billion-dollar business that truly has a global network that has
connections all the way to terrorist cells.”
While child trafficking is condemned
globally, many countries with laws against trafficking and molestation
fail to enforce them. Moreover, such abuses are actually legal in some
countries, such as Thailand and Pakistan. In Thailand, selling children
is not only legal, it’s big business, contributing an estimated $1
billion to the Thai economy. This level of institutionalization makes
rescuing victims from the system of abuse extremely difficult.
Agent Bannon continues:
“We
were able to rescue these [Caucasian] children, but all of the Thai
children we had to leave chained to their beds, padlocked behind steels
doors… These six children – when we told them, ‘Follow us,’ it broke our
hearts to see how quickly they obeyed. No matter what we said, they
obeyed silently and effortlessly. And to see young children so broken
that any adult telling them what to do they immediately obey is perhaps
the most heart-rending aspect of this terrible work.”
“Those images will stay with me. You can’t erase them from your mind.”
Providing further evidence, award
winning independent film director, Bill Maloney, released a landmark
documentary in 2008 entitled Sun Sea & Satan. The film
detailed Maloney’s visits to Jersey in the Channel Islands (between
France and the UK) and the ongoing investigations into allegations of
abuse at Jersey’s children’s care home Haut de la Garenne.
While these examples are shocking, they
are really just scratching the surface of what many understand to be a
much wider network operating all around the world, especially given how
frequent and consistent these kinds of allegations (and apparent
cover-ups) occur.
As MP John Mann told the British Parliament in May, “My constituency is no worse, no different to anywhere else… it’s every aspect of society.”
It is realistic to expect that such a
well-organized criminal network would, like any other criminal network,
utilize whatever influential conspirators or disinformation tactics they
had at their disposal to discredit their accusers, suppress evidence
and cover their tracks. The only difference between criminals who are
protected by institutional veils and those who are not, is the extent of
their influence, not their underlying psycho-pathology.
If we truly want to protect our
children, we need to put aside our preconceptions of pedophiles, public
figures and the agenda of the press, and genuinely try to understand
what is happening. Pedophilia IS happening. We cannot continue
to assume – as convicted pedophiles have always suggested – that
children who accuse seemingly “upstanding” members of our society must
be lying to serve some devious end. The facts at hand prove that is
simply not true.
A Hampstead Coverup?
Not surprisingly, allegations of
deviousness were leveled against Ella Draper following the release of
her 9 year old daughter Alisa and 8 year old son Gabriel’s testimony of
abuse that implicated the children’s father, actor Ricky Dearman, and an
alleged network of Satanic abusers. However, when we consider the
extensive evidence surrounding this case in totality and context, the
official narrative portrayed by mainstream media of a scorned ex-wife
and her two devious children appears to fail numerous tests of
evidentiary scrutiny.
Firstly, a forensic linguistics analysis of the children’s leaked testimony
provides a professional’s view as to the validity of the children’s
statements. Forensic linguistics (or legal linguistics) is the
application of linguistic knowledge, methods and insights to the
forensic context of law, language, crime investigation, trial, and
judicial procedure. Taking into detailed consideration the linguistic
evidence provided by the children’s testimony, expert analysis
(performed anonymously, for the protection of his or her identity) did
not support claims of conspiracy in the children’s testimony, nor
therefore of coercion or duress on the part Ms. Draper.
Furthermore, initial Police medical
examinations of both children showed clear evidence of physical and
sexual abuse. The children’s testimony includes explicit details of
violent and sexual satanic ritual, and the children
described identifying physical markers on the bodies of their alleged
abusers. The children’s recollections also bore similarity to countless
other cases of abuse reported around the world (which, as MP John Mann
reminds us, is only the small fraction of victims who come forward to
tell their stories compared to those who stay silent or are no longer
here to speak at all.)
We must also remember that media silence tells a story of its own.
Although it thrives on scandal (particularly in the UK), mainstream and
even tabloid media did not cover these developments when the story
initially broke in alternative media in early February 2015, instead
maintaining an inexplicable silence on the matter. That was, until the
High Court ruled in late March that Ella Draper (the children’s mother)
and not Ricky Dearman (the father and alleged abuser) had mistreated the
children. Raising many questions in the wider community, it was only
after Mr. Dearman received the protection of a High Court ruling
that the mainstream media reported any details of this complex story, publishing a string of headlines that were all staunchly sympathetic to Mr. Dearman:
Mother who tortured her two children to lie about satanic child sex cult… [20th March 2015]
The yummy mummy, a ‘satanic sex cult’ and the smears that terrorised a very swish London suburb… [23rd March 2015]
Police hunting runaway mother who tortured her two children into inventing fantasy claims about a satanic sex cult… [27th March 2015]
Father falsely accused by his own children of sexually abusing them [reveals]… his horrific ordeal [21st April 2015] (*this article also included photographs of the actor crying to camera.)
The degree to which any such case is covered by the mainstream media, and seemingly covered over by
government agencies, inevitably leads one to wonder — just how deeply
embedded is the culture of abuse within the hierarchies of our
these institutions?
Historically, posing as the protectors
of children while hiding behind celebrity, formality and (apparently)
corrupted legal and media institutions, simultaneously has enabled
pedophiles access to victims while providing them an effective cover
story. Convicted pedophile Jimmy Savile is a perfect example of this;
renowned as a flamboyant former presenter of the UK’s Top Of The Pops,
Savile posed as a philanthropist, working with children and young
people and visiting schools and hospital wards, which enabled him access
to vulnerable children and a cover of institutional respectability.
In a disturbing irony, Savile played the
role of the ‘Child Catcher’ in the 1968 movie, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang,
catching children for the town’s elite.
Speaking of Savile’s apparent decades of criminality, Chairman of the BBC Trust, Lord Patten, wrote in 2012:
”Can
it really be the case that no one knew what he was doing? Did some turn a
blind eye to criminality?… Did some prefer not to follow up their
suspicions because of this criminal’s popularity and place in the
schedules? Were reports of criminality put aside or buried?”
Providing further insight into the
apparent cover-up of Savile’s past by the BBC, UK Telegraph Chief
Reporter Gordon Rayner revealed in his article 2012, Dark Side of Jimmy Savile Glossed Over at BBC, that:
George Entwistle, the former director-general, was told by one manager
that he was “queasy” about the “real truth” of Savile’s past… Danny
Cohen, the Controller of BBC One, and a third executive were given a
further warning, which went unheeded…
When
an ITV documentary exposed Savile’s paedophilia, the BBC was accused of a
cover-up because of its decision to drop the Newsnight film…
[Investigator,
Mr Nick] Pollard, a former head of Sky News, said… that senior people
within the BBC knew about “the unsavoury side of Savile’s character” at
the time…
On
Dec 2, at an awards lunch, Ms [Helen] Boaden [BBC’s Head Of News] says
she told Mr Entwistle that “Newsnight were doing an investigation into
JS [Savile] … it is probable I did mention it was about sex abuse.” Mr
Entwistle’s reply was: “Thanks – keep me posted.”…
The
report recommends that the BBC’s news and editorial management is
reviewed, and questions whether the director-general should also be
editor-in-chief.
According to Pollard’s 185-page report, The BBC’s decision to abort the Savile investigation:
“… started a chain of events that was to prove disastrous for the BBC… one of the worst management crises in the BBC’s history”.
At
the heart of Savile’s story are two interlinked forms of violation – the
abuse of children and the abuse of power. The victims were betrayed not
only by the BBC hierarchy but also by the Surrey police, who failed to
prosecute; by the DJ’s colleagues, who never spoke out; and by all those
in awe of a star whose fame and bogus virtue shielded him from scrutiny
until (no thanks to the BBC) his secrets emerged and the current wave
of horror broke…
Jimmy Savile was given the glory, the freedom and the immunity to do as he wished.
So, with clear conflicts of interest
embedded within its editorial and managerial structures, is the failure
of the media to expose the truth of Savile an act of negligence, or
an institutional cover-up of the highest order? This is a question that
must be answered.
Here we will explore further evidence of
institutional involvement in organized pedophilia networks, to shed
some light on this dark and complex issue.
Child Trafficking, The United Nations and The Global ‘Peacekeepers’ Force
This is clearly an epidemic of
staggering proportions; one we can no longer shrink from or pretend does
not exist. And given the robust intensity of U.S. internal, military,
informational and border securities, and the nation’s
world-record incarcerated rate, this statistic is completely
incomprehensible.
That is, until we begin to look internally for the root cause.
To account for such widespread childhood disappearances, which (for some context) outnumber cancer deaths in the United States by one third, we
must fully comprehend this epidemic is both well organised and
orchestrated. It is therefore no stretch of the imagination to
acknowledge that the many thousands of young children whose faces have
peered out from ‘missing’ posters and milk cartons across the United
States, over many decades, may in fact have fallen victim to a global
child-trafficking and slavery trade.
While child trafficking and abuse
networks tend to be concentrated most highly in relatively peaceful
areas with large foreign business and military interests, this problem
does not appear to be isolated to western nations. Even larger, unknown
numbers of children in Third World countries are disappearing each year,
without a trace, with countless reports from around the world
indicating children are being routinely sold by their families to make
‘ends meet’, sold by orphanages, and kidnapped by gangs who make their
living by supplying ‘stock’ for the child trafficking trade. Some
reports suggest these gangs including highly organized militia and
private “security” companies, and networks operating under the facade of
human rights workers funded by Governments and the United Nations.
“Human
trafficking is a form of serious exploitation and abuse that is
increasingly present in the UN peacekeeping environments. Trafficking
exploits human beings for revenue through sex, forced labour and human
organs. For peacekeeping (UN and other) there is a crisis of perception
in relation to trafficking and the linked issue of sexual exploitation
and abuse, which sees peacekeepers branded as more part of the problem
than the solution, along with criticisms that the issue is not taken
seriously by peacekeeping institutions.”
Today, the “crisis” outlined by the
DPKO has not been formally addressed, and yet many would still rather
believe that all of this is just another crazy ‘conspiracy theory’. In
reality, the dismissal of such theories is at best a moral failure of
our children to act on their behalf, and at worst, a conspiracy of
global proportions.
Mounting evidence suggests
that government-sponsored military contractors have utilized
‘peacekeeping’ positions (which provide both access and trust) to
facilitate systemic abuses, and all under the legal impunity afforded to
peacekeepers who operate these systems of abuse under the guise of
freedom, liberty and philanthropy.
Well
known examples include the 2003 Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse
case (pictured left) in which U.S. military officers subjected prisoners
of war to extreme acts of abuse and humiliation, taking ‘happy snap’
photographs as they did so. The systemic corruption of so-called
“peacekeeping” forces was further demonstrated by a leaked video of
Blackwater military employees who proudly videotaped themselves
helicoptering around Iraq, shooting civilians for target practice and
their own personal amusement. You can learn more here.
In more recent developments, a report from the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) released last month
revealed that UN “peacekeepers” working in Haiti have been found to
have raped Haitian women and children, citing 231 claims from Haitians
of sexual violation at the hands of peacekeepers, often in exchange for
food and other emergency relief supplies.
“For
rural women, hunger, lack of shelter, baby care items, medication and
household items were frequently cited as the ‘triggering need,’” the
report said, adding that UN workers coaxed women and girls into sexual
activities with “church shoes, cell phones, laptops and perfume, as well
as money… In cases of non-payment, some women withheld the badges of
peacekeepers and threatened to reveal their infidelity via social
media,” the report said.
Unfortunately, this is not the first
time that UN workers have been accused of these types of atrocities.
Following the entry of UN “peacekeepers” into Cambodia, Mozambique,
Bosnia, Sudan and Kosovo, authorities in each region reported
sharp increases in allegations of sex trafficking and abuse. Meanwhile,
earlier this year, the United Nations was caught trying to suppress
details of their aide workers raping starving and homeless boys in the Central African Republic.
Notably, this kind of behavior (and
cover-up) of so-called peacekeepers is not unique to the modern “War On
Terror”. In the late ‘90s, military contractor DynCorp
was hired by the U.S. State Department to provide “peacekeepers” for
the United Nations police force in Bosnia, just as in Haiti now.
Subsequently, two well-respected employees, Ben Johnston, a former
DynCorp aircraft mechanic, and Kathryn Bolkovac, a U.N. International
Police Force monitor, independently alleged that UN officials and
employees of Dyncorp were engaging in perverse, illegal and inhumane
behavior, including the purchase of women, illegal weapons, forged
passports, and other criminal and immoral activities.
[Kathryn Bolkovac] signed up with DynCorp, the private contractor providing American personnel for the UN mission in Bosnia.
The
first of several nasty shocks came before she’d even left: among the
recruits at DynCorp’s training week in Texas was a man from Mississippi.
He’d been to Bosnia before and, and he told them all how scenic it was,
adding, “and I know where you can get really nice 12- to 15-year-olds”.
Bolkovac was baffled, believing she’d misheard…
[While
running] a pilot project on violence against women… She found stacks of
American dollars and foreign passports in a safe and, behind a locked
door, seven girls. ‘Sheer terror,’ says Bolkovac of the looks on the
girls’ faces. ‘It was exactly as you see in the film: ‘they’re huddled,
they’re holding each other, they’re on these bare, stained mattresses’…
“They didn’t expect [the police] to help them,” says Bolkovac.
In her role as U.N. Police Force Monitor, Bolkovac also claims to have observed numerous individuals in the Bosnian and U.N. police forces who were not only using trafficked prostitutes but were also on the “traffickers’ pay-roll”. According to Bolkovac, members of the peacekeeping forces were routinely paid to give warnings on raids, and to return children who escaped from their abusers so they could be ‘recycled’ back into the system.
The more Bolkovac investigated, the more her U.N. colleagues turned against her, she says. Notably, four days after her claims were formally raised, Bolkovac was demoted, and a few months later fired by DynCorp outright. However, adding further weight to the validity of her claims, Bolkovac filed a lawsuit for unlawful dismissal against DynCorp in Great Britain following her dismissal — and won. The tribunal that heard her case maintained that, by whistleblowing, Bolkovac had made a ‘protected disclosure’ and should therefore have been protected, not persecuted, for her actions. (You can learn more here.) In closing comments, the tribunal remarked of DynCorp:
‘It is hard to imagine a case in which a firm has behaved in a more callous manner.’
Similarly, Ben Johnston, a former
DynCorp aircraft mechanic, is another employee who claims that he
witnessed his supervisors and fellow employees buying and selling minors
as sex slaves, abusing them and/or selling them to gangs involved in
child prostitution, slavery and pedophile rings.
It is
obvious when it comes to the UN that corruption is ingrained. The UN
was created much like the IMF, World Bank, etc (at around the same time)
as a facility of globalist expansion and this is its underlying goal,
not the other empty phrases that swirl around its “mission.”
Within
hours of the [Bolkovac] ruling DynCorp settled a second whistleblowing
case against it, offering an undisclosed sum to an aircraft mechanic
from Texas called Ben Johnston, who had evidence of UN personnel buying
and selling girls elsewhere in Bosnia. Johnston signed a gagging order.
‘It was very disappointing,’ says Bolkovac with a sigh.
Although disappointing, Johnston’s decision is understandable. A report from CorpWatch.org, US DynCorp Disgrace, explains the circumstances around Johnston’s apparent concession:
According to the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) lawsuit filed in Texas on behalf of the former DynCorp
aircraft mechanic, “in the latter part of 1999 Johnston learned that
employees and supervisors from DynCorp were engaging in perverse,
illegal and inhumane behavior [and] were purchasing illegal weapons,
women, forged passports and [participating in other immoral acts. Johnston
witnessed coworkers and supervisors literally buying and selling women
for their own personal enjoyment, and employees would brag about the
various ages and talents of the individual slaves they had purchased.”
Rather than acknowledge and reward Johnston‘s
effort to get this behavior stopped, DynCorp fired him, forcing him
into protective custody by the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
(CID) until the investigators could get him safely out of Kosovo and
returned to the United States. That departure from the war-torn country was a far cry from what Johnston imagined a year earlier when he arrived in Bosnia
to begin a three-year U.S. Air Force contract with DynCorp as an
aircraft-maintenance technician for Apache and Blackhawk helicopters.
Clearly, Johnston’s treatment and the
final issuing of a gag order is contradictory to the fundamental
principles of truth and freedom these so-called “peacekeeping” bodies
claim to represent. While it is disappointing that Johnston ultimately
submitted to the non-disclosure terms of the gag order, the fact that
such terms were offered or even contemplated by authorities reveals a great deal about the level of knowledge and intent operating behind those institutional walls.
Moreover, the allegations against
DynCorp are not isolated, and Johnston wasn’t the only DynCorp employee
disturbed by what he saw during his tenure. Along with Johnston, another
employee Tom Oliver also lodged similar claims with Army Criminal
Investigation Command (CID), once Johnston had decided to take formal
action outside of the DynCorp chain of command. (You can learn more here.)
These examples aside,
the DynCorp company has a history of allegations relating to systemic
corruption, including claims of waste mismanagement, fraud, human
trafficking and drug-running whilst working under a United
States Government contract to train Police Forces in Afghanistan, Haiti
and Iraq. In 2010 The Guardian in the UK reported that DynCorp had been accused of providing Afghan police with drugs and child prostitutes.
“A
scandal involving foreign contractors employed to train Afghan policemen
who took drugs and paid for young “dancing boys” to entertain them in
northern Afghanistan caused such panic that the interior minister begged
the US embassy to try and “quash” the story, according to one of the US
embassy cables released by WikiLeaks.”
There are many other cases and
eyewitness accounts that raise questions over the legitimacy and agenda
of the DynCorp operation, some of which can be followed here and here.
Yet, it is evident that both corporate and government institutions
prefer to ‘close ranks’ around such allegations, obscuring the chance of
accountability, and in the process, raising further questions about the
extent of corruption within these peacekeeping forces.
With mounting evidence of
organized pedophilia and child-trafficking networks implicating
high-level government, church and charitable institutions, many members
of the community are left wondering: Are the world’s taxpayers
unwittingly be used to fund organized crime? The kind
of crimes that taxpayer-funded ‘War On…’ campaigns purport to combat?
How do we bring criminals to justice if the criminals themselves control
our justice and information systems?
As one of the top three U.S. Defense
Force contractors receiving money from the United States Government, it
is unfathomable that, for the most part, this story was ignored by the
mainstream media in the U.S. With evidence and allegations mounting in
relation to pedophilia, as well as drug- and slave-trafficking, the
United States Government has a moral and legal responsibility not just
to the U.S. people but to the people of the world — in whose backyards
they wage their wars — to investigate DynCorp, and indeed their own
internal regulatory systems. After all, this is the mechanism through
which police, military and U.N peacekeeping forces are trained in
countries around the globe.
This situation did not go unnoticed
within the U.S. Congress. In 2005 U.S. Congresswoman, Cynthia McKinney
questioned then-Secretary Of Defense Donald Rumsfeld over the Dyncorp
scandals:
“I
watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in
September 2003, in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The
President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible
business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for
having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and
children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon
contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now
working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition
Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy of the U.S. Government to
reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?”
Following Congresswoman McKinney’s
statement, Rumsfeld admitted on the record that the allegations were
credible, but wrote them off as the actions of a “few bad apples”,
refusing to investigate the potential that such abuses are in
fact institutionalized, and as evidence suggests, not merely the actions
of a few “rogue” employees. Today, 9 years on, DynCorp remains
unaccountable to these accusations.
You can watch Ms. McKinney’s exchange with Mr. Rumsfeld here.
This all begs the question:
Is the U.S. Government’s
apparent willingness to overlook allegations of misconduct against its
contractors simply because the conduct of DynCorp’s employees is exactly
as it was contracted?
While this situation seems to be of little interest to the United States Government, notably, it is of no interest
to other international legal and regulatory agencies. Protected by
international law, ‘Peacekeepers’ and ‘Humanitarian Aid Workers’ are
indemnified against criminal charges whilst working in foreign lands on
behalf of Government Military or the United Nations. This loophole
creates undisputable opportunity for such positions to be abused for
criminal means, and in the context of child abuse and
trafficking allegations, provides a ‘safe’ mechanism through which
global operations can flourish.
Therefore it is a sad reality that none
of the accused in these cases are ever likely to face criminal charges
under the current systems of governance.
The ‘Supreme Master’ Ching Hai and The ‘Papa Dearman’ Connection
In considering the breadth of evidence
at hand, the extent of corruption evidenced by continually
emerging child-trafficking and abuse cases goes well beyond what we
typically perceive of “corruption”. Such abuses do not just reflect
corruption of process or power, but corruption of the human spirit.
The testimonies provided by the children
in the Hampstead case, and so many other cases the world over, detail
stories of babies been trafficked for the purposes of Satanic ritual. To
summarize this portion of the allegations made in the children’s video
testimony:
Babies are supplied to the UK from all
over the world, including the United States, South Africa, Portugal,
Spain, Gayana, China, India and Hawaii.
Babies are either purchased,
drugged and transported by international courier service, or the parents
(cult members) bring them from other parts of the world.
A high-level member of the network – a
real estate agent – provides empty properties for ritual and sexual
abuse of children to take place.
The rituals they described involve
child rape, sodomy, orgies, torture, cannibalism and human sacrifices.
These activities were also filmed and sold.
Central to the children’s testimony was
the involvement of their father, actor Ricky Dearman, who has known
connections to the self-professed spiritual leader, the ‘Supreme Master’, Ching Hai. The children went on to assert that they worship the ‘Supreme Master’. Notably, the Satanic Bible also states that ‘Satan’s ministers will obey all commands of the ‘Supreme Master‘.
While such an association is not on its own conclusive, these claims
cannot objectively be overlooked, particularly as keeping up a charade
of decency and respectability is vital to abusers, and in keeping with
documented Satanic philosophy.
So then, who are Ricky Dearman and Ching Hai?
Ricky Dearman is involved in the film industry as an actor and has affiliations with ‘Supreme Master Television’,
a television station airing from 14 satellite platforms and reaching
hundreds of millions of households around the world. The beneficiary and
focal point of this self-created spiritual hierarchy, Ching Hai is
worshipped by followers the world over. Actively involved with child
orphanages and schools in third world countries, she also has elite connections, including well-documented links to the Clintons (who themselves are alleged to have been involved in high level criminal activity).
In the research community, there have
long been suspicions that Ching Hai works for the CIA. Supreme Master
Ching Hai is also connected with the United Nations and, under the
impunity afforded to ‘Peacekeepers’, is involved in many of the same
activities as DynCorp’s contractors — in particular, crisis and disaster intervention, a role that places her among the world’s most vulnerable children.
Former members of the sect say
involvement with Ching Hai has proven to be disturbing and dangerous,
while insider allegations against the sect include institutionalize
child rape, child pornography, child trafficking, prostitution, mind
control, ritual torture and murder involving children and animals. (source.)
When we objectively examine this
evidence, it cannot reasonably be argued that further investigation is
unwarranted. Therefore, the apparent unwillingness of authorities to act
on behalf of the victims or to examine documented issues of fact is
increasingly suggestive of a systemic cover-up involving extremely
influential, high-ranking, members of the institutions implicated.
Famous
for its secret handshakes, Freemasonry has long been suspected of
having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the
judiciary and the police…Secret
networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to
corrupt the criminal justice system… Operation Tiberius, written [by
Metropolitan Police] in 2002, found underworld syndicates used their
contacts in the controversial brotherhood to “recruit corrupted
officers” inside Scotland Yard, and concluded it was one of “the most
difficult aspects of organised crime corruption to proof against”.
So, with implications of complicity
reaching far beyond the doors of our most powerful institutions, what of
the grassroots movement attempting to find justice for these children?
The Information War: Disinformation and Infiltration
It has been alleged by many researchers
and activists following the release of the Hampstead tapes that
disinformation agents have been strategically placed within circles
working to validate Ms. Draper’s allegations, in a campaign of confusion
and chaos designed to protect the guilty. I am not alone in suspecting
this tactic was employed at recent public protests held outside the
Hampstead Church, which resulted in two arrests. Where confusion and chaos inevitably reigns, so too does disinformation. This tactic is not new; it has been used against truth-seekers by governments, media and intelligence agencies for the past half-century or more.
The disturbing reality is that
institutionalized pedophilia and child-trafficking networks are among
the most organized and comprehensive abuses upon humanity. It hides in
powerful shadows, inflicts horror on the innocent, and demonizes their
protectors. So, when it comes to fighting organized crime in the 21st
Century, we truly are fighting an information war. If you think the
notion of a deliberate “information war” is paranoid or conspiratorial,
please understand that is the same term used by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2011, when defending her department’s proposed increase to propaganda funding before a U.S. Congressional Committee.
“We are in an information war and we are losing that war… and unfortunately we are paying a big price for it.”
The information war, she added,
is being won by information channels that offer “real news”, adding
that the U.S. should get back “in the game” and do “what we do best.”
“I
watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in
September 2003, in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The
President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible
business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for
having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and
children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon
contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now
working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition
Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy of the U.S. Government to
reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?”
Following Congresswoman McKinney’s
statement, Rumsfeld admitted on the record that the allegations were
credible, but wrote them off as the actions of a “few bad apples”,
refusing to investigate the potential that such abuses are in
fact institutionalized, and as evidence suggests, not merely the actions
of a few “rogue” employees. Today, 9 years on, DynCorp remains
unaccountable to these accusations.
You can watch Ms. McKinney’s exchange with Mr. Rumsfeld here.
This all begs the question:
Is the U.S. Government’s
apparent willingness to overlook allegations of misconduct against its
contractors simply because the conduct of DynCorp’s employees is exactly
as it was contracted?
While this situation seems to be of little interest to the United States Government, notably, it is of no interest
to other international legal and regulatory agencies. Protected by
international law, ‘Peacekeepers’ and ‘Humanitarian Aid Workers’ are
indemnified against criminal charges whilst working in foreign lands on
behalf of Government Military or the United Nations. This loophole
creates undisputable opportunity for such positions to be abused for
criminal means, and in the context of child abuse and
trafficking allegations, provides a ‘safe’ mechanism through which
global operations can flourish.
Therefore it is a sad reality that none
of the accused in these cases are ever likely to face criminal charges
under the current systems of governance.
The ‘Supreme Master’ Ching Hai and The ‘Papa Dearman’ Connection
In considering the breadth of evidence
at hand, the extent of corruption evidenced by continually
emerging child-trafficking and abuse cases goes well beyond what we
typically perceive of “corruption”. Such abuses do not just reflect
corruption of process or power, but corruption of the human spirit.
The testimonies provided by the children
in the Hampstead case, and so many other cases the world over, detail
stories of babies been trafficked for the purposes of Satanic ritual. To
summarize this portion of the allegations made in the children’s video
testimony:
Babies are supplied to the UK from all
over the world, including the United States, South Africa, Portugal,
Spain, Gayana, China, India and Hawaii.
Babies are either purchased,
drugged and transported by international courier service, or the parents
(cult members) bring them from other parts of the world.
A high-level member of the network – a
real estate agent – provides empty properties for ritual and sexual
abuse of children to take place.
The rituals they described involve
child rape, sodomy, orgies, torture, cannibalism and human sacrifices.
These activities were also filmed and sold.
Central to the children’s testimony was
the involvement of their father, actor Ricky Dearman, who has known
connections to the self-professed spiritual leader, the ‘Supreme Master’, Ching Hai. The children went on to assert that they worship the ‘Supreme Master’. Notably, the Satanic Bible also states that ‘Satan’s ministers will obey all commands of the ‘Supreme Master‘.
While such an association is not on its own conclusive, these claims
cannot objectively be overlooked, particularly as keeping up a charade
of decency and respectability is vital to abusers, and in keeping with
documented Satanic philosophy.
So then, who are Ricky Dearman and Ching Hai?
Ricky Dearman is involved in the film industry as an actor and has affiliations with ‘Supreme Master Television’,
a television station airing from 14 satellite platforms and reaching
hundreds of millions of households around the world. The beneficiary and
focal point of this self-created spiritual hierarchy, Ching Hai is
worshipped by followers the world over. Actively involved with child
orphanages and schools in third world countries, she also has elite connections, including well-documented links to the Clintons (who themselves are alleged to have been involved in high level criminal activity).
In the research community, there have
long been suspicions that Ching Hai works for the CIA. Supreme Master
Ching Hai is also connected with the United Nations and, under the
impunity afforded to ‘Peacekeepers’, is involved in many of the same
activities as DynCorp’s contractors — in particular, crisis and disaster intervention, a role that places her among the world’s most vulnerable children.
Former members of the sect say
involvement with Ching Hai has proven to be disturbing and dangerous,
while insider allegations against the sect include institutionalize
child rape, child pornography, child trafficking, prostitution, mind
control, ritual torture and murder involving children and animals. (source.)
When we objectively examine this
evidence, it cannot reasonably be argued that further investigation is
unwarranted. Therefore, the apparent unwillingness of authorities to act
on behalf of the victims or to examine documented issues of fact is
increasingly suggestive of a systemic cover-up involving extremely
influential, high-ranking, members of the institutions implicated.
Famous
for its secret handshakes, Freemasonry has long been suspected of
having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the
judiciary and the police…
Secret
networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to
corrupt the criminal justice system… Operation Tiberius, written [by
Metropolitan Police] in 2002, found underworld syndicates used their
contacts in the controversial brotherhood to “recruit corrupted
officers” inside Scotland Yard, and concluded it was one of “the most
difficult aspects of organised crime corruption to proof against”.
So, with implications of complicity
reaching far beyond the doors of our most powerful institutions, what of
the grassroots movement attempting to find justice for these children?
The Information War: Disinformation and Infiltration
It has been alleged by many researchers
and activists following the release of the Hampstead tapes that
disinformation agents have been strategically placed within circles
working to validate Ms. Draper’s allegations, in a campaign of confusion
and chaos designed to protect the guilty. I am not alone in suspecting
this tactic was employed at recent public protests held outside the
Hampstead Church, which resulted in two arrests. Where confusion and chaos inevitably reigns, so too does disinformation. This tactic is not new; it has been used against truth-seekers by governments, media and intelligence agencies for the past half-century or more.
The disturbing reality is that
institutionalized pedophilia and child-trafficking networks are among
the most organized and comprehensive abuses upon humanity. It hides in
powerful shadows, inflicts horror on the innocent, and demonizes their
protectors. So, when it comes to fighting organized crime in the 21st
Century, we truly are fighting an information war. If you think the
notion of a deliberate “information war” is paranoid or conspiratorial,
please understand that is the same term used by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2011, when defending her department’s proposed increase to propaganda funding before a U.S. Congressional Committee.
“We are in an information war and we are losing that war… and unfortunately we are paying a big price for it.”
The information war, she added,
is being won by information channels that offer “real news”, adding
that the U.S. should get back “in the game” and do “what we do best.”
Broadly speaking, infiltrating, opposing
or discrediting movements serves a number of purposes in an
information/credibility war. Besides gaining inside information,
disinformation agents may deliberately leak information, create
division, and steer the ‘group thinking’ and activity of support
networks away from achieving real outcomes. Controlled opposition also
satisfies the casual concerned observer that “someone is doing
something”. Such infiltration also serves to ‘media tarnish’ the
reputation of the those asking questions of the official
narrative, portraying the extremist Satanic Panic lunatic
archetype that the media loves and the public loathes, and therefore
steering public perception and undermining any factual evidence
they stand for. In this way, the guilty can be made to look like victims
and the victims to look guilty, sabotaging the clear passage of
truth. Historically, this simple kind of manipulation has been extremely
effective, if we are blind to it, and this is something that activists
need to fully understand and remember in all our dealings, if we are
ever to make a dent in uncovering the truth in cases where key evidence
is apparently disregarded by the official narrative.
In an information war,government disinformation agents work on all sides. By
allowing ourselves to be infiltrated, influenced and manipulated, we
make it easy for them to subjugate, infiltrate, divide and
conquer, chalking up another win for the perpetrators of abuse.
And when it comes to cases in which
high-level institutional corruption is already suspected, it would be
naive to assume the work of disinformation agents does not extend as far
as government-led inquiries and judicial process.
Notable Names “Steering The Ship”
In the public discussion of the
Hampstead case, and of organized pedophilia in general, there are some
notable names steering the ship. However many researchers and
truth-seekers are beginning to suspect the ship has been steered in the
wrong direction.
The kind of cover-up tactics activist
believe are being employed in the Hampstead case also appear to have
been employed in Canada after claims of Satanic ritual abuse and murder
of indigenous people were lodged with the Canadian Courts. Kevin Annett,
a former minister of the United Church of Canada, founded the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) in 2010 to support and bring justice to the victims of institutional abuse. According to the itccs.org mandate:
Our
Mandate: (1) To lawfully prosecute those people and institutions
responsible for the exploitation, trafficking, torture and murder of
children, past and present, and (2) To stop these and other criminal
actions by church and state, including by disestablishing those same
institutions.
By
the evidence, it appears the ITCCS is a fabrication. Some investigators
think Kevin Annett is a globalist operative. In that case the ITCCS is a
globalist fabrication to displace, scatter and retard community and
self-sovereign restoration of authentic society. Our working hypothesis
is that one of the functions of ITCCS is to displace and discredit any
genuine [efforts]…
In the course of following through on due diligence we have been attacked and distorted by Annett and followers… [We have] yet to receive verification that ITCCS Brussels personnel or the court exists…
“These
things happen regularly… They are definitely tied into, not just Roman
festivals, but also Satanic calendars. There are certain days of the
year that seem to have more significance in terms of human sacrifice.
New moons apparently often tie in to those times of the month as well.
But the Roman festivals are significant because they seem to be guiding
the actions of these cults that operate within or around the Catholic
Church.”
Incidentally, child welfare groups agree with
the observations Annett now claims to dispute. Given his sudden
divergence from well-established facts, many activists and researchers
now believe the “false stories and labels” are in fact Annett’s.
Concerns have also been raised within activist networks about the role of influential activist Belinda McKenzie, founder of McKenzie Friends.
McKenzie is closely associated with Kevin Annett, having publicly
supported him throughout 2010 and 2011 while he travelled to the UK to
appear at a series of rallies. Rumoured to be an MI-5 agent
with links to money laundering and ‘independent’ think tanks, questions
about McKenzie’s agenda have been further compounded by her recent call
for an ‘amnesty’ for pedophiles — essentially,
advocating increasing legal protection for the perpetrators not the victims of child abuse.
Now, with questions still unanswered
about both Annett and McKenzie’s agenda, it is notable that the
organisations they front (ITCCS and McKenzie Friends respectively) were
founded within months of each other, and perhaps more notably, both
organisations bear a very similar logo – a detail that has not gone
unnoticed within activist circles.
Given the historical prevalence of
disinformation tactics in “information wars”, many truth-seekers are
asking: Have these individuals been strategically placed at the front of
the awareness campaign? Are they here only to keep their fingers on the
pulse, while steering genuine activists away from the truth, and
justice? And what of online awareness campaigns?
As every truth-seeker well knows, the infiltration of organized action groups also extends to the online world, where paid disinformation shills work diligently to distort facts and defame the individuals who oppose the hidden complicity of authorities.
Since January, there have been extensive
online efforts to discredit the testimony of the two children involved
in the Hampstead allegations, and in particular, the integrity of their
mother who first reported the allegations to authorities. These
counter-efforts appear to be coordinated from within London, while
technical data suggests the efforts of activists are being monitored
closely by members of the Westminster Methodist Hall.
It is also worthy to note, the Methodist Church has
long-standing connections to the United Nations, providing Westminster
Methodist Hall as the venue for the very first United Nations meeting
held in 1946.
One particular website appears to
have been created specifically to undermine any and all evidence
relating to the Hampstead case. Calling themselves Hoaxtead Research and
bearing remarkable resemblance to the Hampstead Research website, the
Hoaxtead Research site works primarily to denounce the testimony of the
children in this case and to attack any research that hints at
wrong-doing on the part of anyone but the children and their
mother. The tactics employed by Hoaxstead Research are reported by many
activists to involve only character assassinations of those involved
without credible or objective research. This development has led many in
the community to believe this site was created only to enact the
tried-and-tested tactic of the guilty — to discredit credible testimony
with emotion, chaos and confrontation.
Among the hoax theories that are
circulating online, the most commonly believed is that the children’s
mother, Ella Draper, concocted this story and coached her children to
repeat it, in order to gain legal custody of her children. However, 3
minutes of research reveals the simple flaw in this hoax theory: Ella
Draper was already the children’s primary care giver, and so had no
need to make false claims in order to secure custody of her children. In
2011, a residence order issued by the court assigned legal
residence to Ms. Draper, and subsequent claims of disputed access to the
children arose after claims of abuse came to light, not before.
You can read the chronology of events as outlined by Ms. Draper HERE,
which details allegations of violence against Ricky Dearman as well as
the events that led Ms. Draper to take action on behalf of her children.
Delivering her judgement at the High Court, Mrs Justice
Pauffley said the children had been forced to concoct accounts of
horrific events and that their stories were a result of relentless
emotional and psychological pressure and significant physical abuse by
their mother’s new partner in collaboration with their mother.
However, the claims of psychological and
emotion abuse at the hands of Ms. Draper and her partner did not
correlate to the physical evidence of sexual abuse provided by the
initial police investigation, which revealed scar tissue on the
children’s genitals and other evidence of physical trauma directly
related to long-term sexual assault.
While these facts may have been obscured
in the media to the casual observer, many activists believe this in
an act of desperation, itself providing further evidence of just how far
up the social and political ladder the corruption that protects
pedophiles from justice actually reaches.
Be Part Of The Solution
For the sake of our children, and their children, we need to accept the facts; where there is smoke, and lots of it, there is
fire. As informed and conscientious human beings, we have a moral
responsibility to hear these witness accounts, and take the time to
analyse and discern the scope of problem we are being confronted with —
no matter how overwhelming it may seem. Yet, to the majority of the
public this kind of information is so horrendous and unthinkable that it
is beyond the capacity of many people to believe this could be true,
much less contemplate the details. The result is cognitive-dissonance, which inevitably leads to inaction.
But our ignorance of this matter is no
longer an excuse! Given the weight of evidence at hand, it is no longer
acceptable nor is it even logical to write-off each accusation of
organized and ritualized abuse that arises as an isolated fiction. There
is certainly reason to suspect that many of the 8 million children who
‘disappear’ each year are falling victim to coordinated pedophile
networks. A culture built on Satanic ritual, they have the motives, the
power and the means to traffic children around the globe, under the
guises of “upstanding citizens” and “peace keepers” and “good
Samaritans”, with the necessary influence to suppress the truth through
corruption of the so-called justice system.
So, how do we bring criminals to justice if the criminals themselves control the justice system?
Firstly, we must stop accepting the
calculated excuses of the perpetrators of organized crime, and finally
take steps to confront and dismantle it.“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (and women-Ed.) to do nothing.” ~ Edmund Burke
As responsible adults in a world
seemingly gone mad, who else but us – you and me, here and now – can
speak and act for these abused children? Our failure to make a stand in
whatever way we can, whatever the cost, would mean a failure of
our most basic human ‘duty of care’ to our youngest and most
vulnerable. Our children are precious, and they have the right to be
children; they are our most valuable investment in humanity’s future. To
fail them would be a failure of our society.
It is the therefore obligation of the
adult world to defend the rights and safety of our precious youth, and
hold accountable those who sadistically and methodically seek to harm
them. We must call pedophiles out as the organized,
institutionally-protected ‘monsters in suits’ they are, and carry out
our ‘duty of care’ with all the diligence we can muster.
With so much information,
misinformation (non-deliberate) and disinformation (deliberate)
surrounding this case, and pedophile networks in general, it is
essential that we as responsible members of the community exercise
critical discernment of all information, sources and motivations. As
history has begun to prove, with information and awareness on our side
we can oust these Satanic predators from the institutional veils they hide behind, no matter what their role or rank may be.
In the words of freelance scholar and author John Lash:
By
the evidence, it appears the ITCCS is a fabrication. Some investigators
think Kevin Annett is a globalist operative. In that case the ITCCS is a
globalist fabrication to displace, scatter and retard community and
self-sovereign restoration of authentic society. Our working hypothesis
is that one of the functions of ITCCS is to displace and discredit any
genuine [efforts]…
In the course of following through on due diligence we have been attacked and distorted by Annett and followers… [We have] yet to receive verification that ITCCS Brussels personnel or the court exists…
“These
things happen regularly… They are definitely tied into, not just Roman
festivals, but also Satanic calendars. There are certain days of the
year that seem to have more significance in terms of human sacrifice.
New moons apparently often tie in to those times of the month as well.
But the Roman festivals are significant because they seem to be guiding
the actions of these cults that operate within or around the Catholic
Church.”
Incidentally, child welfare groups agree with
the observations Annett now claims to dispute. Given his sudden
divergence from well-established facts, many activists and researchers
now believe the “false stories and labels” are in fact Annett’s.
Concerns have also been raised within activist networks about the role of influential activist Belinda McKenzie, founder of McKenzie Friends.
McKenzie is closely associated with Kevin Annett, having publicly
supported him throughout 2010 and 2011 while he travelled to the UK to
appear at a series of rallies. Rumoured to be an MI-5 agent
with links to money laundering and ‘independent’ think tanks, questions
about McKenzie’s agenda have been further compounded by her recent call
for an ‘amnesty’ for pedophiles — essentially,
advocating increasing legal protection for the perpetrators not the victims of child abuse.
Now, with questions still unanswered
about both Annett and McKenzie’s agenda, it is notable that the
organisations they front (ITCCS and McKenzie Friends respectively) were
founded within months of each other, and perhaps more notably, both
organisations bear a very similar logo – a detail that has not gone
unnoticed within activist circles.
Given the historical prevalence of
disinformation tactics in “information wars”, many truth-seekers are
asking: Have these individuals been strategically placed at the front of
the awareness campaign? Are they here only to keep their fingers on the
pulse, while steering genuine activists away from the truth, and
justice? And what of online awareness campaigns?
As every truth-seeker well knows, the infiltration of organized action groups also extends to the online world, where paid disinformation shills work diligently to distort facts and defame the individuals who oppose the hidden complicity of authorities.
Since January, there have been extensive
online efforts to discredit the testimony of the two children involved
in the Hampstead allegations, and in particular, the integrity of their
mother who first reported the allegations to authorities. These
counter-efforts appear to be coordinated from within London, while
technical data suggests the efforts of activists are being monitored
closely by members of the Westminster Methodist Hall.
It is also worthy to note, the Methodist Church has
long-standing connections to the United Nations, providing Westminster
Methodist Hall as the venue for the very first United Nations meeting
held in 1946.
One particular website appears to
have been created specifically to undermine any and all evidence
relating to the Hampstead case. Calling themselves Hoaxtead Research and
bearing remarkable resemblance to the Hampstead Research website, the
Hoaxtead Research site works primarily to denounce the testimony of the
children in this case and to attack any research that hints at
wrong-doing on the part of anyone but the children and their
mother. The tactics employed by Hoaxstead Research are reported by many
activists to involve only character assassinations of those involved
without credible or objective research. This development has led many in
the community to believe this site was created only to enact the
tried-and-tested tactic of the guilty — to discredit credible testimony
with emotion, chaos and confrontation.
Among the hoax theories that are
circulating online, the most commonly believed is that the children’s
mother, Ella Draper, concocted this story and coached her children to
repeat it, in order to gain legal custody of her children. However, 3
minutes of research reveals the simple flaw in this hoax theory: Ella
Draper was already the children’s primary care giver, and so had no
need to make false claims in order to secure custody of her children. In
2011, a residence order issued by the court assigned legal
residence to Ms. Draper, and subsequent claims of disputed access to the
children arose after claims of abuse came to light, not before.
You can read the chronology of events as outlined by Ms. Draper HERE,
which details allegations of violence against Ricky Dearman as well as
the events that led Ms. Draper to take action on behalf of her children.
Delivering her judgement at the High Court, Mrs Justice
Pauffley said the children had been forced to concoct accounts of
horrific events and that their stories were a result of relentless
emotional and psychological pressure and significant physical abuse by
their mother’s new partner in collaboration with their mother.
However, the claims of psychological and
emotion abuse at the hands of Ms. Draper and her partner did not
correlate to the physical evidence of sexual abuse provided by the
initial police investigation, which revealed scar tissue on the
children’s genitals and other evidence of physical trauma directly
related to long-term sexual assault.
While these facts may have been obscured
in the media to the casual observer, many activists believe this in
an act of desperation, itself providing further evidence of just how far
up the social and political ladder the corruption that protects
pedophiles from justice actually reaches.
Be Part Of The Solution
For the sake of our children, and their children, we need to accept the facts; where there is smoke, and lots of it, there is
fire. As informed and conscientious human beings, we have a moral
responsibility to hear these witness accounts, and take the time to
analyse and discern the scope of problem we are being confronted with —
no matter how overwhelming it may seem. Yet, to the majority of the
public this kind of information is so horrendous and unthinkable that it
is beyond the capacity of many people to believe this could be true,
much less contemplate the details. The result is cognitive-dissonance, which inevitably leads to inaction.
But our ignorance of this matter is no
longer an excuse! Given the weight of evidence at hand, it is no longer
acceptable nor is it even logical to write-off each accusation of
organized and ritualized abuse that arises as an isolated fiction. There
is certainly reason to suspect that many of the 8 million children who
‘disappear’ each year are falling victim to coordinated pedophile
networks. A culture built on Satanic ritual, they have the motives, the
power and the means to traffic children around the globe, under the
guises of “upstanding citizens” and “peace keepers” and “good
Samaritans”, with the necessary influence to suppress the truth through
corruption of the so-called justice system.
So, how do we bring criminals to justice if the criminals themselves control the justice system?
Firstly, we must stop accepting the
calculated excuses of the perpetrators of organized crime, and finally
take steps to confront and dismantle it.
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (and women-Ed.) to do nothing.” ~ Edmund Burke
As responsible adults in a world
seemingly gone mad, who else but us – you and me, here and now – can
speak and act for these abused children? Our failure to make a stand in
whatever way we can, whatever the cost, would mean a failure of
our most basic human ‘duty of care’ to our youngest and most
vulnerable. Our children are precious, and they have the right to be
children; they are our most valuable investment in humanity’s future. To
fail them would be a failure of our society.
It is the therefore obligation of the
adult world to defend the rights and safety of our precious youth, and
hold accountable those who sadistically and methodically seek to harm
them. We must call pedophiles out as the organized,
institutionally-protected ‘monsters in suits’ they are, and carry out
our ‘duty of care’ with all the diligence we can muster.
With so much information,
misinformation (non-deliberate) and disinformation (deliberate)
surrounding this case, and pedophile networks in general, it is
essential that we as responsible members of the community exercise
critical discernment of all information, sources and motivations. As
history has begun to prove, with information and awareness on our side
we can oust these Satanic predators from the institutional veils they hide behind, no matter what their role or rank may be.
In the words of freelance scholar and author John Lash:
“It’s
a horrible crime. But like any other crime, it can be overturned by the
proof of the evidence. The only way to maintain that crime is to hide …
and suppress the evidence that contradicts the official narrative… It’s
my view that the people who have attempted to do that are losing
control. They’re losing control of the narrative…
“If
you want to see … a life of pleasure and mutual aid on this planet,
never perfect… and if you recognize the narrative that is preventing
that from happening, you must also recognize that it is not enough to
defeat and overcome that narrative. There must be another narrative to
replace it.”
So, on behalf of the world’s children
and parents alike, I plead with those employed within government,
religious, military, media, and peacekeeping
institutions — particularly those in positions of power and authority — to do your job.
Blow the whistle. Speak the truth, and stand up courageously for the
rights of children everywhere. If you still have a common love of
humanity, but until now have been too afraid of potential consequences
to come forward, now is the time. While the general public remains
uninformed about the true nature of the ‘elite’ and their abuses, the
political narrative surrounding these cases will remain the same. But
with your help, the momentum of the current public awareness
campaign will soon reach ‘critical mass’.
Please add your name to the petition to Justice Anna Pauffley. We are requesting that she:
Honour the residence order put in place in 2011 which assigned legal residence of the two Hampstead children, Alisa and Gabriel, to their mother.
Order a thorough and comprehensive
investigation of the children’s original disclosures, and the handling
of the inquiry by the institutional powers implicated, including the
circumstances that led to the children revoking their allegations after 6
days in institutional care.
Research. Discern. Inform others.
We are the victims’ only voices, and together we will be heard.
We’re watching you Westminster!
Please
take a moment to watch this powerful and heartfelt speech by Russell
Burton at the anti-child abuse rally “Victims & Survivors Unite –
Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse” held at Westminster on 27th June 2015.
“WHAT WE ALLOW WILL CONTINUE. We must be the generation that puts an end to this evil because I fear for the sanity of future generations if this filth is allowed to retain its control over us.”
Further information can be found in the following detailed articles and videos:
Chinese babies found in luggage – Police in south-western China have
discovered 28 baby girls (drugged) packed into nylon suitcases and
stacked on the luggage rack of a long-distance bus. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2877039.stm
Sonya
van Gelder is an independent researcher, author and
truth-seeker. Growing up in Africa, New Zealand and Australia, Sonya
gained a keen interest in the varied cultures of the indigenous peoples
worldwide, and has since undertaken over 20 years of personal research
into ancient mysteries and esoteric teachings.
Sonya’s continuing research has led her to many of
Australia’s significant sacred areas and to working closely with
Aboriginal elders. Feeling a deep connection to and a mutual respect for
the aboriginal elders and their stories, Sonya feels it is of vital
importance to take a look at ancient aboriginal lore and explore its
multi-level significance both locally and globally.
Sonya is currently writing a book that will explore
the similarities in the symbolism and mythologies within our ancient
mysteries worldwide, connecting many dots and helping to bring humanity
to a greater awareness of significant truths to who we really are, and
of the esoteric wisdom and spirituality that was once a global
understanding.
While Sonya’s work as a children’s rights activist is
a departure from her focus on ancient mysteries, she is a passionate
advocate of children’s rights who feels driven to use her skills as a
researcher and writer to help break down the walls of institutionalized
abuses, and bring justice and security to our society’s most vulnerable.
The Black Sheep tries to warn its friends with the truth it has seen, unfortunately herd mentality kicks in for the Sheeple, and they run in fear from the black sheep and keep to the safety of their flock.
Having tried to no avail to awaken his peers, the Black Sheep have no other choice but to unite with each other and escape the impending doom.
