by Jon Rappoport
May 16, 2013
When Chris Matthews files for divorce from Barack Obama, you know the world is upside down.
When the liberal online rag,
Politico, features a clip of Matthews saying, “[Obama] obviously likes
giving speeches more than he does running the executive branch,” we’re
through the Looking Glass.
The liberal jackals are stalking
their own leader, the President. After making mind-bending excuses for
Obama’s disastrous presidency, they’ve suddenly heard a supersonic
whistle, and they’re out for blood.
Jonathan Turley, famous liberal
constitutional lawyer, is counting Obama’s sins, ranging far beyond the
current IRS and AP phone-tapping scandals.
James Goodale, former lawyer for the
NY Times, is writing, at the Daily Beast, “Obama is fast becoming the
worst national security press president, worse than Nixon, and it may
not get any better.”
Liberal radio host Bill Press is
calling for Obama to fire Eric Holder. Charley Rangel says, “No one
believes that the president has given us a sufficient answer [to the IRS
and DOJ scandals].”
Representative Zoe Lofgren and NBC’s Brian Williams are down Obama’s neck.
Just a few weeks ago, after the
Boston bombing, Obama was unassailable. He was still the king with his
own people. Now, he’s turning into lunch meat.
Liberals could be shouting and
claiming that the IRS targeting of conservative, patriot, and
constitutional groups had nothing to do with Obama, that he’s entirely
innocent, that he just got rid of the IRS chief and all is well…but
they’re not saying it.
They could be insisting that the DOJ
tapping AP phones was all on Eric Holder, and Obama had nothing to do
with it…but they’re not saying it.
The current press virus is: Obama is Nixon.
What’s going on?
Who’s giving liberals the order to go after Obama? Who shifted the political wind overnight?
Yesterday, I examined Watergate from
the perspective of Nixon’s betrayal of the Rockefeller family. That was
the key to his ouster from the presidency. The Washington Post was used
as the attack dog. Are we looking at something similar here?
Has Obama failed to live up to his promises to people far more powerful than he is? If so, what is his betrayal?
Is it simply the fact that the
Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations have chosen
Hillary Clinton as the next president—and in order to make that happen,
major diversions have to guide the press and public away from her role
in the Benghazi catastrophe? Is that why we’re suddenly seeing the IRS
and DOJ scandals erupting?
Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission
(TC) certainly wields enough power to torpedo Obama, if they want to.
And they surround Obama.
Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.
Keep in mind that the original
stated goal of the TC was to create “a new international economic
order.” Consider the following TC members, who have held Obama posts:
Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;
James Jones, National Security Advisor;
Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;
Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.
In the run-up to his inauguration
after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the
co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
The TC is the hand that feeds Obama. Has he bitten it?
Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote, four
years before birthing the TC with his godfather, David Rockefeller:
“[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has
ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and
multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far
in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”
A closer look at Tim Geithner’s
circle of economic advisers reveals the chilling Trilateral effect: Paul
Volker; Alan Greenspan; E. Gerald Corrigan (director, Goldman Sachs);
and Peter G Peterson (former CEO, Lehman Brothers, former chairman of
the Council on Foreign Relations). These men are all Trilateral members.
How many foxes in the hen house do
we need, before we realize their Trilateral agenda is controlling the
direction of our economy?
Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some
even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best
interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to
build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one
world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am
proud of it.”
So yes, if the Trilateral
Commission wanted to sink Obama’s presidency, they could call that shot.
They could radically influence press coverage of the president, they
could pull strings and end the worshipful celebration of Obama as the
great prophet. They could bring hard doom to him.
Nixon started imposing tariffs
on imported goods. That was his Waterloo. He ran afoul of the massive
Rockefeller free trade agenda. What has Obama done?
Is he stalling on war with Iran?
Has he gone too far in his embrace of Islamic partners? Has he finally
balked at continuing the war in Afghanistan?
Setting economic and political
policy for the US is a prime operation of the Trilateral Commission. If
Obama has crossed swords with the TC, he would be treading on very
From the shadows of history, let
me give you an illustration of how far and deep the TC can reach. It
really does boggle the mind.
Full article HERE
The Black Sheep tries to warn its friends with the truth it has seen, unfortunately herd mentality kicks in for the Sheeple, and they run in fear from the black sheep and keep to the safety of their flock.
Having tried to no avail to awaken his peers, the Black Sheep have no other choice but to unite with each other and escape the impending doom.
What color Sheep are you?