Visitors to this website know that this is happening all the time and 9/11 was the most famous example, but here was a British national newspaper publishing the story.
Now it has gone. Do you think you could explain why Daily Mail?
This was the original Daily Mail link for the article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html
Syria is not a war caused by 'rebels' within the country just as the Libya 'revolution' was not. They are part of a systematic fake 'Arab Spring' takeover of the whole of Africa and the Middle and Near East by forces working through the United States, Israel and NATO (all the same thing if you go high enough or deep enough). I have been exposing this plan in my books for years and what is now happening in Mali and planned for country after country in Africa orchestrated through the US AFRICOM network is all part of this. Watch out South Africa because they want you, too. They want everything because they are insane.
They manufacture a different excuse for each new country although with Libya and Syria it was exactly the same. 'Rebels' funded and armed by the US and NATO (via Qatar) start attacking government targets and when the government returns fire the forces behind the 'rebels' scream through their compliant and ignorant media 'Gadhafi/Assad is killing his own people'. They then use this 'humanitarian' excuse to send the boys in to slaughter the innocent and steal oil reserves and other assets.
They did this in Libya and they have been desperate to do this in Syria but it has not been as easy as they thought and so they planned to covertly arrange a chemical attack so they could say 'we have to send in NATO to stop Assad killing his own people with chemical weapons'.
No wonder the Daily Mail article has been removed so quickly. When their game is exposed they lose their cover stories.
I have found this version of the Mail story on another website here.