YayaCanada
Sunday, December 27, 2009
The more I read about the latest plane terrorist, the more I know it's all fake.
Yesterday we were told the terrorist himself said the explosive was strapped to his leg, today we are told by the Telegraph, quoting nobody at all, that it was sewn into his underwear. Okay, maybe he was wearing long winter underwear.
The Telegraph, again quoting nobody at all, tells us the explosive was the same as Richard Reid used. Yet in all this time, authorities have not come up with a detection method for this type of explosive?
I can't wait to see what stories the other rags are coming out with.
From the Guardian: A preliminary FBI investigation found that the device contained an explosive known as PETN, or pentaerythritol. Agents recovered what appeared to be the remnants of a syringe found near Abdulmutallab's seat, which is thought to have been part of the device.
"Thought to be" doesn't cut it, and "preliminary investigation" sounds like guesswork. Again we are told it was his leg burning, so I guess he really was wearing long winter underwear. Wonder why they don't say that? A "preliminary investigation" would have uncovered that fact, at least.
The Guardian goes on to say that the guy's own father reported him to the US embassy and Nigerian security 6 months ago, and still they let him fly! Or else his father just wants to cover his own hiney in case he's "thought to be" involved.
The biggest giveaway is that although the US reportedly put the suspect on a list of known terrorists, they didn't think that was "negative enough" to keep him from flying!
But by golly, from now on - until the impact dies down - a ball of kleenex in the pocket of anybody not on US intelligence lists will not be allowed.
The Mirror says Abdulmutallab bought a one-way ticket. Way to draw attention to himself if he was just an ordinary bloke, but he was a "terrorist" so it had to be overlooked.
The Australian reveals that the story that he went to the washroom and then pretended to be sick, pulling a blanket over himself, is not directly from passengers and airline staff, but from a report that the FBI drew up. Will we hear later, as so often is the case, that passengers were not even interviewed by the FBI?
Basically, they can say that Abdulmutallab said all sorts of things. The part about Al Qaeda in Yemen is rich. Is anyone planning to attack Yemen now to find Bin Laden?
Speaking of rich, the Star reports that the guy lived in a 5 million dollar flat in London. Did Daddy pay for that? Or someone more local, more "intelligent"?
Question: Can explosives flames be put out with a few bottles of water? Will we ever know if he was wearing asbestos?
Another question: What kind of a terrorist would immediately point the finger at his colleagues and give their location? I mean, if he wasn't afraid to die in an explosion, why would he be afraid of the FBI?
That Shuringa fellow is quite a star. In one report he flew over the backs of seats, and he alone subdued the man, and "I helped put out the fire" he says modestly. Well, every plane scare needs a hero,even if you have to wonder if he was part of the staging.
From Earthtimes:
"The fire was getting worse. I grabbed the suspect out of the seat, to see if he was wearing any more explosives," Schuringa told CNN. "The cabin crew came with fire extinguishers and ... I helped put out the fire."
Schuringa and a flight attendant then grabbed Abdulmutallab and dragged him to the first-class section, where "we stripped him ... to make sure he had nothing else," Schuringa said.
This is the first indication that more than just bottles of water and patting down the flame was employed. Good gracious; they stripped him. Surely they would have said if he was wearing long winter underwear - I mean that's a rather vital point, don't you think?
