UK mental health act changed to make “swine flu” vaccine refusal reason to be detained in hospitals (article below)
Or are you crazy if you do take it?
You decide: Would you like to end up with a permanent chronic autoimmune disease caused by the flu shot or an acute infectious disease like the flu that is rarely fatal and lasts 3 days?
Maybe this is why Dr Rebecca Carley calls vaccines ‘the Real Weapons of Mass Destruction.”
UK mental health act changed to make "swine flu" vaccine refusal reason to be detained in hospitals
Temporary changes have been made to the UK Mental Health Act in response to the “swine flu” pandemic to allow people with suspected mental health issues to be quickly detained, and on the assessment of only one doctor and not two as usual, under the pretext of fears of upcoming staff shortages due to the pandemic emergency.
The change in the law opens the door to allowing people who refuse the “swine flu” vaccine to be declared paranoid and summarily sectioned (and thus forcibly drugged) under government guidelines.http://www.managementinpractice.com/default.asp?title=SwineflupromptschangestoMentalHealthAct&page=article.display&article.id=18628
Swine flu prompts changes to Mental Health Act
Wednesday 23rd September 2009
The government plans to rush through measures allowing people with suspected mental health issues to be quickly detained because of fears over staff shortages in any forthcoming swine flu outbreak, it has been revealed.
The temporary changes to the Mental Health Act, as laid out in an unusually short consultation lasting just one month, would mean it would only take one doctor, rather than two, to have a person sectioned and put on medication without their consent.
The measures could have a serious effect on the thousands of patients with psychiatric issues who currently live outside state care, meaning many could be detained against their will on the word of just one health professional.
With very little information on the proposed changes published, many mental health experts have warned the government that they risk side-lining an already vulnerable community and have called on it to spell-out the full raft of changes proposed in the consultation.
